ARTICLE
13 August 2024

CoA Luxembourg, August 6, 2024, Order On Service, UPC_CoA_205/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
A defendant company in China cannot, as a starting point, be served a complaint via a company within the same group in a Contracting Member State
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

1. Key takeaways

A defendant company in China cannot, as a starting point, be served a complaint via a company within the same group in a Contracting Member State

Attempts to serve in China by any method provided for by the Hague Convention pursuant to R.274.1(a)(ii) RoP shall normally be made before service permitted by the law of the state where service is to be effected (R. 274.1(b) RoP) or by alternative methods or at an alternative place (R. 275 RoP) is permitted

The Hague Service Convention applies to companies with a registered office in China (R. 274.1(a)(ii) RoP)

2. Division

CoA Luxembourg

3. UPC number

UPC_CoA_205/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Appeal

5. Parties

Nera Innovations Ltd. (Ireland)

Xiaomi Communications Co., Ltd. (China), Xiaomi Inc. (China), Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V. (the Netherlands), Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH (Germany)

6. Patent(s)

EP 2 642 632

7. Jurisdictions

8. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 271.5(a) RoP, Rule 274, Rule 275

To view the full article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More