Black Swan Was Wrongly Decided In The BVI – What Is The Situation In Cyprus?

MK
Michael Kyprianou Law Firm

Contributor

The firm, based in Cyprus, has an international presence. Its services include Dispute Resolution, Property, Shipping, Immigration, Commercial and Corporate Law. It is highly ranked by leading legal directories, including Legal500 and Chambers and regularly receives accolades from the Cyprus Government and international bodies, in recognition of its excellent service and commitment to the values of integrity, efficiency and professionalism.
In 2010 the BVI Commercial Court ruled that claimants could seek Black Swan freestanding freezing injunctions in the BVI, in support of foreign substantive proceedings, ...
Cyprus Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In 2010 the BVI Commercial Court ruled that claimants could seek Black Swan freestanding freezing injunctions in the BVI, in support of foreign substantive proceedings, without the need to bring a substantive claim in the BVI. This innovative Black Swan jurisdiction was named after the landmark judgment in Black Swan Investment ISA v Harvest View Limited and it made the BVI jurisdiction very appealing to claimants seeking to safeguard their interests.

However, on 29 May 2020, the Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal in Broad Idea International Limited v Convoy Collateral Limited, directly overruled Black Swan and held that the BVI Courts do not have the power to grant freestanding injunctions in aid of foreign substantive proceedings.

What is the situation in Cyprus?

In Cyprus a freezing injunction (or other injunctive relief) can be obtained in aid of foreign arbitration proceedings pursuant to section 9 of the International Commercial Arbitration Law No. 101/1987, provided both countries are signatories to the New York Convention of 1958.

A freezing injunction can only be obtained in aid of foreign substantive court proceedings, where there is a multilateral or bilateral treaty connecting Cyprus with the country where the court proceedings are filed, specifically providing for the availability of such an interim protective measure.

However, this should be changing soon since the long awaited new Civil Procedure Rules are expected to have a specific provision enabling parties to secure injunctive relief in aid of foreign substantive court proceedings even where there is no multilateral or bilateral treaty connecting Cyprus with the other country.

The Minister of Justice and the President of the Supreme Court of Cyprus announced in end of February 2020 (just before the lockdown as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic), that work for the modernisation of the Civil Procedure Rules was in its final stages. They also explained that the modernisation will, in practice, involve the replacement in full of the current Civil Procedure Rules, which have been in force since the 1950s, with a completely new set of rules.

We are eagerly awaiting the enactment of the new Civil Procedure Rules as the availability of a Black Swan injunction in Cyprus will add to the tools available to claimants in international asset recovery cases and will make the Cyprus jurisdiction even more attractive.

Originally published 15 June, 2020.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More