ARTICLE
29 October 2020

Consumer Law Class Action

EH
ELVINGER HOSS PRUSSEN, société anonyme

Contributor

Independent in structure and spirit, Elvinger Hoss Prussen guides clients on their most critical Luxembourg legal matters. Committed to excellence and creativity in legal practice, our firm delivers the best possible advice for businesses, institutions and entrepreneurs, playing a unique role in the development of Luxembourg as a financial centre.
Bill of law 7650 ("Bill "), which was recently presented by the Government, aims to introduce a class action procedure allowing for the compensation of damages...
Luxembourg Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Bill of law 7650 (" Bill"), which was recently presented by the Government, aims to introduce a class action procedure allowing for the compensation of damages suffered by a group of consumers resulting from the same illicit behaviour by, or practice of, a professional.

Inspired by Belgian and French precedents, the Bill anticipates the adoption by the European Union of what is still a proposal for a directive on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers.

According to the Bill, class actions could be brought before the court, and the group represented by, either a consumer who is part of the group or a qualified entity such as, in particular, a consumer organisation. If successful, a judge could order a cessation or prohibition of a wrongful or illegal practice, as well as a compensation for damage suffered by the group of consumers.

Several categories of disputes would nevertheless be excluded from the proposed class action procedure, such as:

  • Disputes in relation to anti-competitive practices; and
  • Disputes between consumers and professionals supervised by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) or the Commissariat aux Assurances (CAA), except those concerning consumer loans, mortgage loans, as well as contracts for financial services concluded remotely and insurance contracts concluded remotely.

The Bill provides for several procedural particularities, such as, inter alia, an admissibility pre-phase during which a judge shall rule whether the specific admissibility conditions provided for by the Bill were respected, the possibility for the judge to determine whether to apply an opt-in or an opt-out procedure, the possibility for a consumer representing the group to sue (as opposed to reserving the class action procedure to qualified entities) as well as the appointment of a liquidator for the distribution of the amounts allocated to the consumers.

An update will be circulated as soon as the Bill is adopted by Parliament.

Originally published by Elvinger Hoss, October 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More