ARTICLE
30 April 2021

Israeli Supreme Court Authorizes The Self-Regulatory Content Takedown Arrangement Between The Gov't And Online Platforms

PC
Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz

Contributor

Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz logo
Pearl Cohen is an international law firm with offices in Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Our strength is derived from decades of legal experience and an intimate knowledge of the cutting edge technological, legal, and transactional issues facing our clients in local and cross border matters. This combination of experience and knowledge allows us to provide sound and innovative advice to clients worldwide.
The Israeli Supreme Court has scrutinized and authorized the unofficial arrangement for the removal of harmful content published on online platforms.
Israel Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Israeli Supreme Court has scrutinized and authorized the unofficial arrangement for the removal of harmful content published on online platforms. The arrangement was voluntarily established between the Israeli Ministry of Justice's Cyber Unit and platforms such as Facebook but is not based on any statutory authority.

The Court's judgment was delivered on a petition filed by the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) and Adalah, the Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel who argued that the Cyber Unit operates an "Alternative Enforcement" mechanism which subverts the right to due process and unlawfully restricts freedom of expression on social networks. The Cyber Unit objected to the petition, arguing that the takedown requests submitted to the platforms focus mainly on egregious content such as incitement to terror, content endangering child safety, etc.

The court authorized Cyber Unit's self-regulatory arrangement on several grounds. First, the petitioners laid insufficient evidence to establish the infringement of civil rights, particularly given that the content taken down was published by Artificial Intelligence bots (i.e., algorithms) which are not humans eligible for civil rights. Second, the Cyber Unit's takedown requests are not official state action that encroaches on civil rights because the private digital platform actors are the ones that de facto decide to remove the content, even though some of the takedown requests are only marginally lawful The Israeli Supreme Court also found that the arrangement accomplishes important objectives of national security and public order.

The Supreme Court recognized the concerns raised regarding how the Cyber Unit influences the platforms' judgment regarding content takedowns and the resulting risk that the digital platforms are the Cyber Unit's long-arm due to their interests in maintaining proper relations with the government. The Court characterized the Cyber Unit's activities as "Concealed Governmental Activities" and called on the legislature to consider enacting legislation that would regularize the self-regulatory arrangement.

CLICK HERE to read the Israeli Supreme Court's decision in Adalah et al v. Israeli Ministry of Justice's Cyber Unit et al (in Hebrew).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More