ARTICLE
1 February 2023

商标异议案件中对商标近似混淆性的考量

K
Kangxin

Contributor

Kangxin Partners is a leading Chinese IP firm, providing comprehensive IP services to global and domestic clients for over 25 years. Experienced IP professionals work with clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies to secure their IP assets. Kangxin grows exponentially while continuing to provide exceptional IP services.
在司法实践中,在商标近似性判定时,首先应以混淆可能性作为基本标准。在此基础上,还应根据个案的具体情况,既要对商标整体进行比对A
China Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

在司法实践中,在商标近似性判定时,首先应以混淆可能性作为基本标准。在此基础上,还应根据个案的具体情况,既要对商标整体进行比对,也要将中、英文拆分开来比对二者的主要识别部分、文字构成、呼叫读音等进行隔离对比,从而更客观判定商标的近似性。

除此之外,结合在先商标的显著性、知名度等相关因素进行判断。

Please click here to view the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More