ARTICLE
4 January 2011

Treatment of Breaches of Specialised Foreign Currency Deposit Account Regulation

MB
Mayer Brown

Contributor

Mayer Brown is a distinctively global law firm, uniquely positioned to advise the world’s leading companies and financial institutions on their most complex deals and disputes. We have deep experience in high-stakes litigation and complex transactions across industry sectors, including our signature strength, the global financial services industry.
On 1 December 2010 the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Official Letter No. 9374/NHNN-QLNH (Letter) to reply to two questions raised by SBV's Long An Province Branch (Long An Branch).
Vietnam Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Article by Dao Nguyen , Kevin B. Hawkins and Thinh Phu Dan

Originally published 24 December 2010

Keywords: Vietnam, SBV, foreign currency, deposit account, regulation

On 1 December 2010 the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Official Letter No. 9374/NHNN-QLNH (Letter) to reply to two questions raised by SBV's Long An Province Branch (Long An Branch).

Both questions are about the observance of the current provisions on foreign exchange control in respect of foreign direct investment into Vietnam.

Under Circular No. 04/2001/TT-NHNN of the SBV dated 18 May 2001 providing guidelines on foreign exchange control in respect of foreign-invested enterprises and foreign parties to business co-operation contracts, these entities are required to open a specialised foreign currency deposit account at a bank authorised to deal in foreign currency in order to conduct capital transfer transactions by foreign investors. These transfers comprise:

  • Transfers into and out of Vietnam of legal capital or capital for implementation of a business co-operation contract by foreign investors;
  • Transfers into and out of Vietnam of medium- and long-term foreign loan principal;
  • Transfers out of Vietnam of interest and fees on medium- and long-term foreign loans for the purpose of repayment of foreign loans;
  • Remittance out of Vietnam of legal profit and other income of foreign investors;
  • Withdrawals of capital for the purpose of transfer into the foreign currency deposit account of an enterprise with foreign owned capital or a foreign business co-operation party;
  • Deposits of capital from foreign currency accounts of enterprises with foreign owned capital or foreign business co-operation parties.

In the first case, Long An Branch sought the SBV's opinion on how to deal with breaches of such regulations by two foreign investors named Greenfield (Thailand) Ltd. and Oriental Ford Holdings Ltd. The SBV's Letter replies:

"The payment by Oriental Ford Holdings Ltd. to Greenfield (Thailand) Ltd. for the transaction of capital transfer at Greenfield Vietnam Joint Stock Company, which has been made outside the territory of Vietnam and not via a foreign-currency special-use capital account opened at a bank operating in Vietnam, has not yet complied with the regulations on foreign exchange control in respect of foreign direct investment into Vietnam. However, there are no specific provisions to deal with this administrative breach by these two companies. Therefore, the branch should issue an instrument to remind and require Greenfield Vietnam Joint Stock Company, Greenfield (Thailand) Ltd. and Oriental Ford Holdings Ltd. to draw experience."

In the second case, Long An Branch was advised by SBV to base on current regulations on foreign exchange control applicable to foreign direct investment in Vietnam to issue written guidelines to Oriental Ford Holdings Ltd. Such guidelines should clearly state that Vietnamese Dong proceeds from transfer of capital to three Vietnamese investors must be used to purchase foreign currency for remittance out of Vietnam to their home country.

Learn more about our Vietnam offices and Corporate & Securities practice.

Visit us at www.mayerbrown.com

Copyright 2011. JSM, Mayer Brown International LLP and/or Mayer Brown LLP. All rights reserved. Mayer Brown is a global legal services organization comprising legal practices that are separate entities ("Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: JSM, a Hong Kong partnership, and its associated entities in Asia; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales; and Mayer Brown LLP, a limited liability partnership established in the United States. The Mayer Brown Practices are known as Mayer Brown JSM in Asia.

This article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein. Please also read the JSM legal publications Disclaimer.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More