ARTICLE
25 August 2022

Final Judgement On The Finnish Insulation Price Fixing Cartel

BB
Bird & Bird

Contributor

Bird & Bird logo
Bird & Bird is an international law firm which supports organisations being changed by technology and the digital world. We combine exceptional legal expertise, deep industry knowledge and refreshingly creative thinking, to help clients achieve their commercial goals. 1300+ lawyers in 29 offices: Europe, USA, Middle East and Asia Pacific.
In July 2022, the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland upheld the Market Court's decision to impose penalties on construction insulation manufacturers for participating in cartel conduct through price fixing.
Finland Antitrust/Competition Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In July 2022, the Supreme Administrative Court of Finland upheld the Market Court's decision to impose penalties on construction insulation manufacturers for participating in cartel conduct through price fixing.

In 2021, the Market Court found three insulation companies guilty for running a national price fixing cartel and imposed penalty payments of over 4 million EUR. The Finnish Consumer and Competition Authority (“FCCA”) granted one of the companies involved in the cartel immunity from the penalty payments as it was the first to contact the FCCA and provide information on the cartel. The Market Court's decision was mainly in line with the FCCA's proposal in 2018 to impose penalty payments.

The Market Court found that the insulation companies agreed on price increases for EPS insulations for 2013 and 2014, as well as the amount, timing and manner of execution of the increases, in meetings and telephone conversations. The Market Court found that the companies had jointly sought to increase the price level of EPS insulations and to improve their profit margin by means of price fixing covering the whole of Finland. The price increases were scheduled to take place precisely when the seasonal demand peaked, which underlined the harmful nature of the cartel.

The Supreme Administrative Court came to the same conclusion and stated there were no grounds to change the Market Court's decision. It confirmed that the Market Court's assessment was not only based on oral testimony, but also in written reports.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More