ARTICLE
27 September 2017

MFDA Receives High Marks In CSA's Annual Oversight Review

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
On September 15, 2017, certain members of the Canadian Securities Administrators released their oversight review report of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association for the period August 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 15, 2017, certain members of the Canadian Securities Administrators released their oversight review report of the Mutual Fund Dealers Association (MFDA) for the period August 1, 2015 to January 31, 2017 (the 2017 Report). The 2017 Report followed a joint oversight review of the regulatory functions of the MFDA by Staff at six provincial securities regulators (the Review).

The Review evaluated (i) whether selected regulatory processes were effective, efficient and applied consistently and fairly, and (ii) whether the MFDA complied with the terms and conditions of recognition orders granted by securities regulators. The 2017 Report also reported on the MFDA's progress in resolving findings from the last oversight review report published on November 18, 2016 which covered the period July 1, 2012 to July 31, 2015 (the 2015 Report).

While the CSA identified a few areas for improvement, as discussed below, the MFDA appears to have successfully resolved the "high priority" issues that had been identified in the previous report.

Summary of Findings of 2017 Report

The 2017 Report found that MFDA adequately addressed the issues raised in the 2015 Report and made significant progress in completing action plans for the findings that resulted from that report. The findings cited in the 2015 Report included two high priority findings in enforcement and one high priority finding in financial compliance.

Within the areas reviewed by Staff during the period of the Review, Staff identified:

  • one low priority finding in enforcement regarding the adequacy of documentation in case files for which the MFDA's response and plan of action was acknowledged by Staff without further comment,
  • one medium priority finding in financial compliance regarding the lack of policies and procedures for the handling of repeat deficiencies. The MFDA responded with a plan of action to address the finding and a timeframe for resolution by September 2017 and follow up with Staff by February 28, 2018, and
  • no findings with regard to concerns with the MFDA meeting the relevant terms and conditions of the recognition orders granted by securities regulators.

Further to these findings, the 2017 Report indicates that Staff will monitor and follow up with the MFDA's progress in taking corrective action on the findings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More