ARTICLE
25 September 2013

Canadian Food Inspection Agency Is Third Party In Proposed Class Action

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
In Harrison v. XL Foods Inc., a putative class action launched against XL Foods Inc. for negligence in connection with the 2012 recall of meat from an Alberta processing plant that was found to be contaminated with E. coli, the defendant XL has successfully added the Canadian Food Inspection Agency as a third party to the lawsuit.
Canada Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Harrison v. XL Foods Inc., a putative class action launched against XL Foods Inc. for negligence (among other alleged wrongs) in connection with the 2012 recall of meat from an Alberta processing plant that was found to be contaminated with E. coli, the defendant XL has successfully added the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) as a third party to the lawsuit.

The CFIA brought a summary judgment motion to defeat this procedural step, but in a decision released on September 5, 2013, the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta held that the CFIA had not met the high test for summary dismissal of the claims advanced against it. The class action plaintiff failed in a separate attempt to persuade the court to stay the third party notice until after the certification hearing and any subsequent common issues trial between the plaintiff and the defendants.

While the court's full written reasons will not be available until after the certification hearing, Associate Chief Justice Rooke did state in his memorandum of decision that the issues between the defendants and the CFIA are inter-related with the common issues between the plaintiff and the defendants. The court was therefore of the opinion that they should be considered at the certification hearing. Indeed, if the class action is certified, the court opined that the class proceeding would be the appropriate forum to determine any "common issues" between the defendants and the CFIA – unless the court decides otherwise at the certification hearing.

For additional product liability updates and resources, please visit our Canadian Product Liability Law Blog

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More