ARTICLE
8 November 2015

Anti-Spam: Partial Compliance Is Not Good Enough

GL
Goodmans LLP

Contributor

Goodmans LLP logo
Goodmans is internationally recognized as one of Canada’s pre-eminent business law firms. Based in Toronto, the firm has market-leading expertise in M&A, corporate and transaction finance, private equity, real estate, tax, restructuring, litigation, intellectual property and other business-related specialties.
In the first enforcement activity that did not involve a flagrant breach of Canada's antispam legislation, a well-known Canadian company has been criticized by Canada's anti-spam regulator...
Canada Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Yesterday, anti-spam enforcement came to Canada's mainstream businesses. In the first enforcement activity that did not involve a flagrant breach of Canada's antispam legislation, a well-known Canadian company has been criticized by Canada's anti-spam regulator, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), for sending a limited number of email messages that were not fully compliant.

The company agreed to pay $150,000 for alleged violations of Canada's anti-spam legislation. It was alleged that the company sent some commercial emails that did not contain an unsubscribe mechanism, in some emails the unsubscribe mechanism was not clearly or prominently set out, and certain emails did not provide the required complete contact information. Also, "the company was unable to provide proof that it had obtained consent for each electronic address that received its commercial emails."

As a result of the CRTC investigation, the company undertook to, among other things, improve its existing compliance program to ensure its activities will be fully compliant with Canada's anti-spam legislation, including increased training and education for staff and improved corporate policies and procedures. Nonetheless, the CRTC publicly named the company, issuing a press release trumpeting the $150,000 the company is to pay.

This enforcement action appears to be a sign that the CRTC is not only focusing on bad actors, but also on companies that are partly but not fully compliant with anti-spam legislation. Accordingly, organizations should continue to ensure that they are compliant, including with respect to email mechanics and retaining proof that each person to whom a commercial electronic message is sent has consented to receiving such message.

The content of this article does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on in that way. Specific advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More