ARTICLE
27 February 2019

Every Day Counts In The Life Of Your Patent!

GL
Goodmans LLP

Contributor

Goodmans LLP logo
Goodmans is internationally recognized as one of Canada’s pre-eminent business law firms. Based in Toronto, the firm has market-leading expertise in M&A, corporate and transaction finance, private equity, real estate, tax, restructuring, litigation, intellectual property and other business-related specialties.
Pursuant to its Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement commitments, Canada recently enacted patent term adjustment provisions which can extend the 20-year period of patent protection for up to an additional two years.
Canada Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Pursuant to its Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement commitments, Canada recently enacted patent term adjustment provisions which can extend the 20-year period of patent protection for up to an additional two years.

The "Certificate of Supplementary Protection" regime permits patentees to seek an additional two years of protection for patents that pertain to a medicinal ingredient, or combination of medicinal ingredients, contained in a drug for which the authorization for sale is the first authorization for sale issued with respect to the medicinal ingredient or the combination of medicinal ingredients.

The period of extension is computed by reference to the time taken for approval by the Minister of Health under the Food and Drug Regulations. Importantly, the two-year extension may be reduced where the Minister of Health is of the opinion that a person's failure to act resulted in a period of unjustified delay in the process of obtaining the authorization for sale.

Few certificates of supplementary protection have been granted in Canada and there has been no consideration of what circumstances, if any, would constitute a failure to act sufficient to reduce the two-year maximum.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently considered a potentially analogous issue. In Supernus Pharmaceuticals v Iancu, the Court found that the United States Patent and Trademark Office exceeded its statutory authority by subtracting days from Supernus' patent term adjustment where the company had not failed to make reasonable efforts to prosecute its application. The test applied by the Court was whether the applicant in the period of its purported delay could have taken any steps. If not, its actions were not unreasonable.

While the decision considers the use of patent term adjustment to compensate for delays in the patent office, and not regulatory approval, it may nonetheless provide insight into the considerations the Minister may undertake when considering a patent extension in Canada.

A copy of the decision can be found here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More