Supreme Court Of Canada Leave Applications

SB
Smart & Biggar

Contributor

Smart & Biggar uncovers and maximizes intellectual property and technology assets for our clients. Today’s fast-paced innovation economy demands a higher level of expertise and attention to detail when it comes to IP strategy and protection. With over 125 lawyers, patent agents and trademark agents collaborating across five Canadian offices, Smart & Biggar is trusted by the world’s leading innovators to find value in their IP rights. As market leaders in IP, Smart & Biggar’s team is on the pulse when it comes to the latest developments and the wider industry changes that impact our clients. To stay informed, visit smartbiggar.ca/insights, including access to our RxIP Update (smartbiggar.ca/insights/rx-ip-updates), a monthly digest of the latest decisions and law surrounding the life sciences and pharmaceutical industries.
Eli Lilly seeks leave in olanzapine section 8 damages action.
Canada Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

SCC denies Idenix leave to appeal in SOVALDI dispute. 
On April 26, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Idenix's application for leave to appeal (docket no. 37781) the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA)'s decision ( reported here) which affirmed the trial decision relating to two competing patents over Gilead's SOVALDI (sofosbuvir). The FCA upheld the validity of Gilead's Patent No. 2,527,657, and declared Idenix's Patent No. 2,490,191 invalid on the basis of insufficiency of disclosure and inutility.

Eli Lilly seeks leave in olanzapine section 8 damages action. 
As previously reported, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) dismissed Eli Lilly Canada (Lilly)'s appeal of a trial decision awarding more than $70 million to Teva Canada (Teva) under section 8 of the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations in respect of olanzapine (Lilly's ZYPREXA). The FCA granted Teva's cross-appeal seeking to add to its recovery lost pipefill sales and an adjustment to account for an under-reporting of sales in the data relied on by both parties' experts: Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Teva Canada Limited, 2018 FCA 53. On April 23, 2018, Lilly applied to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal (docket no. 38077).

The preceding is intended as a timely update on Canadian intellectual property and technology law. The content is informational only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. To obtain such advice, please communicate with our offices directly.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More