ARTICLE
7 September 2017

McInnes Cooper's Mike Melvin & Alex Warshick In The Franchisevoice: Reasonableness And The Enforceability Of Franchise Non-Competition Covenants

MC
McInnes Cooper

Contributor

McInnes Cooper logo
McInnes Cooper serves industry-leading clients in markets across North America and abroad with a relentless client focus and commitment to strategic collaboration. Our professional resources span six locations in key economic centers across Atlantic Canada, offering a full spectrum of legal services tailored to meet the growing needs of clients.
Non-compete clauses in franchise agreements offer franchisors important and legitimate protections from unfair competition – but only if they meet the legal test to be enforceable.
Canada Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Non-compete clauses in franchise agreements offer franchisors important and legitimate protections from unfair competition – but only if they meet the legal test to be enforceable. It's key that franchisors regularly review their non-compete clauses with experienced legal counsel to ensure they are reasonable and extend no further than necessary to protect the franchisors legitimate interests. McInnes Cooper Franchise lawyer  Mike Melvin and law student Alex Warshick review the factors courts consider when deciding whether a franchisor's non-compete is reasonable – and thus enforceable – in their article Reasonableness and the Enforceability of Franchise Non-Competition Covenants, as published in FranchiseVoice, Summer 2017.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More