ARTICLE
10 January 2018

Notable Changes To The Ontario Human Rights Code Likely On Their Way

ML
McMillan LLP

Contributor

McMillan is a leading business law firm serving public, private and not-for-profit clients across key industries in Canada, the United States and internationally. With recognized expertise and acknowledged leadership in major business sectors, we provide solutions-oriented legal advice through our offices in Vancouver, Calgary, Toronto, Ottawa, Montréal and Hong Kong. Our firm values – respect, teamwork, commitment, client service and professional excellence – are at the heart of McMillan’s commitment to serve our clients, our local communities and the legal profession.
Bill 164 has now passed Second Reading and been referred to the Standing Committee on Regulations and Private Bills.
Canada Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In October 2017, we advised of some important changes to the Ontario Human Rights Code proposed through Bill 164, the Human Rights Code Amendment Act – a private member's bill put forward by Liberal MPP Nathalie Des Rosiers.

At the time, we advised that Bill 164 had only received First Reading and would still be subject to legislative and committee debate. Bill 164 has now passed Second Reading and been referred to the Standing Committee on Regulations and Private Bills.

Notably, however, the debate on the Bill at second reading seems to indicate that it will likely to get through Committee with few (if any) substantial amendments. While opposition members commented on Bill 164, little was said to indicate that the proposed Human Rights Code amendments will face heavy opposition when voted upon.

Bill 164 would add four new prohibited grounds for discrimination: immigration status, genetic characteristics, police records, and social condition. Employers should be particularly aware of the potential impacts of adding immigration status and social condition as grounds under section 5 of the Code, which bars discrimination in employment. Both proposed new grounds under the Code would require additional diligence on the part of employers, particulars in the context of hiring and workplace promotion.

We will continue to monitor Bill 164 and update you on any important developments.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2018

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More