ARTICLE
14 April 2015

Drug Testing In Ontario: Is It Worth The Risk?

DL
Dale & Lessmann LLP

Contributor

Dale & Lessmann LLP is a full service Canadian business law firm located in Toronto, Ontario. Our legal expertise includes corporate and commercial, mergers and acquisitions, employment, real estate, franchise, cannabis, tax, construction, immigration, infrastructure and renewable energy, intellectual property, bankruptcy and insolvency, wills and estates law and commercial litigation.
Pre-employment drug testing in Ontario is generally not permissible; The Ontario Human Rights Commission ("OHRC’) has stated that: "Since drug testing cannot be shown to actually measure impairment...
Canada Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Pre-employment drug testing in Ontario is generally not permissible; The Ontario Human Rights Commission ("OHRC') has stated that: "Since drug testing cannot be shown to actually measure impairment, pre-employment drug testing should not be conducted. It is the OHRC's view that, in the absence of clear medical research, pre-employment alcohol testing does not appear to predict an employee's ability to perform the essential requirements of a safety-sensitive position. All it can do is assess impairment before the person is actually on the job. It is therefore difficult to see how an employer could justify pre-employment alcohol testing."

In order to justify drug testing, an employer must meet the following three-part test:

  1. The employer has adopted the standard or test for a purpose that is rationally connected to the performance of the job;
  2. The employer adopted the particular standard or test in an honest and good faith belief that it was necessary to the fulfillment of that legitimate work-related purpose; and
  3. The standard or test is reasonably necessary to accomplish that legitimate work-related purpose.1

As a result, only employees in "safety-sensitive" positions may be tested for drugs. Drug testing should be limited to determining actual impairment of an employee's ability to perform or fulfill the essential duties or requirements of the job. It should not be directed towards simply identifying the presence of drugs or alcohol in the body. If the testing has no demonstrable relationship to job safety and performance, then it is a violation of the employee's human rights. Where drug testing will be a valid requirement of the job, the employer should notify job applicants at the time the offer of employment is made.

In most circumstances, drug testing is probably not worth the risk of a human rights claim. Even if the employer meets the threshold for drug testing, in the event that the test comes back positive, the employer has accommodation duties. Unless the accommodation would cause undue hardship upon the employer; this duty requires the employer to work together with the employee to permit the employee to work despite having a drug problem, and the employer would have to make attempts to try to facilitate rehabilitation.

Footnote

1 Pre-Employment Testing for Drug and Alcohol Use as Part of an Employment Related Medical Examination

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More