Canada Proposes New AI Law For Private Sector Inspired By EU's Proposed AI Act

FR
Fogler, Rubinoff LLP

Contributor

For more than 40 years, we have invested in the success of each of our clients, leading them toward the achievement of their business and legal goals. The team focused nature of our firm means that clients benefit from our collective experience and the tailored approach we bring to each matter. At Fogler, Rubinoff LLP we pride ourselves on our exceptional client service, resourcefulness, and our entrepreneurial spirit. With expertise in over twenty areas of practice and across numerous industries, we see ourselves as a centralized resource for our clients. Our clients include financial institutions, publicly traded corporations, securities dealers, emerging companies, construction companies, real estate developers and lenders, franchisors, First Nations, and family-owned enterprises and individuals. To learn more about how we can assist with your business and legal needs visit: foglers.com.
On June 16, 2022, the Canadian government introduced Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022.
Worldwide Privacy
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On June 16, 2022, the Canadian government introduced Bill C-27, the Digital Charter Implementation Act, 2022.

It is a continuation of the government's initiative to reform federal private sector privacy law. Bill C-27 replaces Bill C-11, which died on the order paper when the 2021 election was called. One of the key new elements in Bill C-27 is the proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act ("Canada's AIDA"), which aims to regulate the development and encourage the responsible use of artificial intelligence ("AI") in Canada (for our recent briefing on how Bill C-27 – including Canada's AIDA – will impact Canadian businesses, click here).

Canada's AIDA has drawn inspiration from the EU's proposed Artificial Intelligence Act (the "EU's AI Act"). The EU's AI Act was introduced on April 21, 2021, representing a significant step to comprehensively regulate AI. Since its introduction, the EU's AI Act has been influential in providing a model for governments seeking to regulate AI with the objective of encouraging the responsible use and overall safety of AI.

In connection with Fogler Rubinoff's work for clients, we have developed a table (click here) comparing how Canada's AIDA and the EU's AI Act address the following core elements: purposes/objectives of proposed law; definition of AI system; application; risk-based approach; high-impact systems (definitions and requirements); prohibited AI systems; transparency; confidentiality; risk management; oversight; notifications; offences; and penalties.

This table illustrates the influence of the EU's AI Act on Canada's AIDA. It also highlights that the EU's AI Act addresses the specifics of many key elements that are left to be articulated in the yet-to-be-published regulations under Canada's AIDA. We want to share this table for the benefit of privacy and AI law and policy stakeholders who are studying Canada's AIDA with a view to participating in the expected consultations to finalize Canada's AIDA and to develop its accompanying regulations.

NOTE: This table is only a summary of key statutory provisions from Canada's AIDA and the EU 's AI Act. For more information, please consult the statutory provisions directly.

Bill Hearn, Partner, Fogler Rubinoff LLP

and

David Young, Principal, David Young Law (with help from Max Samuels, Summer Law Student at Foglers)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More