Supreme Court Of Canada Grants Leave To Appeal In Market Timing Class Action And Declines To Hear Appeal Of Wireless Service Providers In Class Action Over "System Access Fees"

SE
Stikeman Elliott LLP

Contributor

Stikeman Elliott LLP logo
Stikeman Elliott is a global leader in Canadian business law and the first call for businesses working in and with Canada. We provide clients with the highest quality counsel, strategic advice, and creative solutions. Stikeman Elliott consistently ranks as a top law firm in our primary practice areas. www.stikeman.com
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal the Court of Appeal for Ontario’s decision in "Fischer v. IG Investment Management".
Canada Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave to appeal the Court of Appeal for Ontario's decision in Fischer v. IG Investment Management which upheld certification of a class action alleging that the defendant mutual fund managers permitted securities market conduct called "market timing" in certain of the mutual funds that they managed resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses to long-term investors.  Even though the defendants had entered into settlement agreements with the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) in which they paid $205.6 million to aggrieved investors prior to the commencement of the class action, the Court of Appeal held that capital markets participants that settle complaints with the OSC may still be subject to class action lawsuits because regulatory proceedings may not be the preferable procedure for resolving the issues of investors. Our blog post on the Court of Appeal decision can be found here.

While leave to appeal the market timing case was granted, the Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of wireless service providers from the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan's decision in Microcell Communications Inc. v. Frey which upheld certification of a class action for unjust enrichment to recover fees described as "system access fees", "system administration fees", "licence administration fees" or "system licence administration fees" alleged to have been wrongfully collected.  The class action seeks several billion dollars in compensation for class members over a period of approximately 20 years.  Leave having been denied by the Supreme Court of Canada, the case can now go forward for determination on its merits.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More