ARTICLE
29 March 2022

Disputes between directors and shareholders and the importance of taking proactive steps early

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
Strategic opportunities to protect the business and assets or to pursue a recovery may be lost because of delay.
Australia Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

We are regularly engaged to assist directors and shareholders who are engaged in disputes, often where there is a 50/50 deadlock, as the interests in the business are equally owned (whether as shareholders or beneficiaries of a trust).

Often the parties in question are related or are long-term friends, which makes the dispute more complicated as emotions run deep. It is not uncommon for these disputes to resemble a 'family law' type dispute between two partners. Indeed, the emotions and accusations that are often made are in many respects very similar to a family law separation.

Because of the historical relationships involved, there is a natural tendency of the parties to exhaust much time and energy trying to resolve the dispute themselves instead of calling in independent professionals. Whilst there is nothing wrong with this approach, parties often get caught up in the emotional aspects of the dispute, neglecting the underlying business and its assets which can be seriously impacted during this time.

Much time is often wasted (in some cases, over a year or more), and when either party eventually engages a lawyer, opportunities to resolve the matter on a more favourable commercial outcome are sometimes lost. This includes properties being mortgaged and assets otherwise being depleted or transferred to entities beyond the reach of the aggrieved party.

Where the dispute involves serious allegations of impropriety, fraud, breaches of directors' duties or oppressive conduct, acting sooner rather than later could make a significant difference to the ultimate outcome for the innocent parties seeking a quick financial resolution. Strategic opportunities to protect the business and assets or pursue a recovery may be lost because of the delay; assets may have been transferred to another jurisdiction (such as overseas) making them more difficult or even impossible to recover, and solutions such as injunctive relief to freeze assets and possibly appoint a receiver, manager or provisional liquidator may also become more challenging.

We are seeing this more and more where the parties in question do not speak English and sometimes believe that it is better to try and resolve the dispute using cultural mechanisms rather than engaging lawyers. By the time that these clients come to see us, they are often upset that they can no longer pursue a speedy recovery (or at all) and don't understand that under the Australian legal system, taking pro-active steps sooner than later is often critical.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More