ARTICLE
17 April 2018

Valuer and retail leases update: Late exit from the Act

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
Need to consider if over threshold & the Act applies as this could affect the valuation and any management responsibilities.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Where the occupancy costs are close to the $1 million threshold, consideration will need to be given as to whether the Act applies, which could affect the valuation and any management responsibilities.

In brief: A recent VCAT decision has raised the possibility that even if the Retail Leases Act 2003 (the Act) applies when the lease is entered into, as occupancy costs are under $1 million, should the occupancy costs exceed $1 million during the term of the lease, the Act may cease to apply.

What you need to know:

For most leases, occupancy costs are well under $1 million and so the issue will not arise. However, if the occupancy costs are close to or in excess of $1 million, it is necessary to determine if the occupancy costs were below $1 million when the lease was entered into (assuming it is a lease potentially under the Act). If so, assuming the other criteria are met, the Act may apply.

But if the occupancy costs now exceed $1 million, questions will arise as to whether the Act still applies. In the absence of an agreement between the parties, it will be necessary to obtain advice as to whether the Act may apply.

Background:

The decision in William Buck (Vic) Pty Ltd V Motta Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] VCAT 15 commented on this issue, although the member was not required to make any determination. Senior Member Riegler of VCAT correctly determined that the Act could not apply in circumstances where the $1 million occupancy costs had reduced over the term of the lease from above to below $1 million, as a result of section 11 (2) of the Act. This is correct based on the reading of the Act.

However, Senior Member Riegler states that the reverse does not apply. This means that if the occupancy costs increased to over $1 million during the term of the lease, then the premises will fall outside of the Act.

Conclusion:

Where the occupancy costs are close to the $1 million threshold, consideration will need to be given as to whether the Act applies, which could affect the valuation and any management responsibilities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More