ARTICLE
7 October 2016

Valuers Update: Determination excluding 15-year leases from Retail Leases Act upheld

M
Madgwicks

Contributor

Madgwicks Lawyers has been serving clients since 1975 with reliable legal advice, clear explanations of outcomes, and practical options. Their deep expertise helps clients navigate complex matters by providing informed decision-making. The firm prioritizes developing long-term relationships with clients locally and globally, adding value beyond legal services. With over 100 staff and expertise in key practice areas, Madgwicks is an award-winning commercial firm. As part of Meritas, they are connected to a global alliance, offering business law services in 92 countries.
Certain long-term leases may be excluded from the Act, if the lease complies with the 2004 Ministerial Determination.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In brief: Leases granted at commercial rents can be excluded from the operation of the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic) (Act), if the lease complies with the Ministerial Determination dated 20 August 2004 (Determination). In order to comply, the lease must be for a term of 15 years or more and require the tenant to carry out substantial work on the premises.

What you need to know:

  • A lease can be excluded from the Act if it is for a term of 15 years or more and requires the tenant to carry out substantial work on the premises.
  • To ensure that the lease is excluded from the operation of the Act, the lease must be carefully drafted to satisfy the requirements of the Determination.

Background

There has been some conjecture in recent years as to whether a lease for a term of 15 years or more, with a requirement that a tenant undertake substantial work on the premises, will be excluded by the Act. The Determination sought to exclude such leases from the Act but the Small Business Commissioner refused to provide a certificate confirming such leases are excluded by the Act, unless the leases are granted at a nominal rent.

In June 2016, in the matter of Luchio Nominees Pty Ltd v Epping Fresh Food Market Pty Ltd, VCAT determined that the lease was excluded from the operation of the Act by virtue of the Determination. This was because the lease was for a term of 20 years, and contained an obligation on the tenant to carry out construction works on the Premises.

Conclusion

When undertaking a market rent review, or assisting a party in a lease negotiation, if the term is 15 years or more you should consider whether the lease will be governed by the Act. The lease will not be governed by the Act if there is an obligation on the tenant to carry out substantial work, pay the cost of any substantial work, or the tenant is not entitled to remove works undertaken by the tenant during the term of the lease. It should also be noted that under the Determination, a lease can excluded from the Act if there is a renewal granted of a 15-year lease, or variation of such lease, where the lease would have been excluded from the operation of the Act.

Whether a lease is or is not governed by the Act can have a significant impact on a market rent review. Accordingly, we recommend that you seek advice as to whether the lease is governed by the Act in such circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Madgwicks is a member of Meritas, one of the world's largest law firm alliances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More