ATO updates its No Action Position for COVID-19 rent relief provided by SMSF landlords to related parties

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
ATO clarified 2 aspects of its position for SMSF landlords providing rent relief to related party tenants in this pandemic.
Australia Coronavirus (COVID-19)
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The ATO has now clarified two aspects of its no action position for SMSF landlords providing rent relief to related party tenants because of COVID-19.

We have written about the issues with SMSF landlords providing related party tenants with rent relief – see SMSF landlords – can you agree to COVID-19 rent relief? and SMSF landlords – ATO provides guidance on providing temporary COVID-19 rent reduction

The ATO has now clarified two aspects of its no action position for SMSF landlords providing rent relief to related party tenants because of COVID-19.

Where the landlord providing rent relief is an interposed entity with an SMSF owner

The ATO's original no action position only applied where the SMSF was the landlord and owned the real estate directly.

Often SMSFs have an interest in an entity that owns the land and leases it to the related party tenant. Although a different structure, many of the same principles apply.

The ATO has now confirmed that its no action position extends to where an entity such as a company or unit trust owns the real estate and leases it to a related party tenant, and the SMSF owns an interest in the company or unit trust.

Documentation required

It is very important that any changes to leases by SMSFs, and the reasons for them, are properly documented.

The ATO now specifically includes this in their no action position, so the appropriate documentation is absolutely vital. The ATO acknowledges this can be 'with a minute or a renewed lease agreement or other contemporaneous document'.

The documentation SMSFs should have in place includes:

  • an outline of why the rent relief is appropriate (with figures)
  • a formal amendment to the existing lease terms.

Failure to have the documentation could jeopardise accessing the ATO's no action position.

Conclusion

It is good to see the ATO taking a practical approach and extending their relief to situations where it is not the SMSF that owns the real estate and include entities in which an SMSF owns an interest.

The ATO is also reinforcing that it is not enough for SMSFs (and interposed entities) to provide rent relief without proper documentation, both as to the changes and the rationale for them.

© Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers

Cooper Grace Ward is a leading Australian law firm based in Brisbane.

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please contact Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More