ARTICLE
23 August 2020

Social media misfire – online petition set up to support suspended principal leads to defamation case

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
Social media facilitates communication with staff and parents, but schools need policies and safeguards for its use.
Australia Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Social media is a necessary but risky medium in which schools communicate. While social media provides schools with greater exposure and facilitates communication with staff and parents, schools need to have strong policies and other safeguards for social media use.

This comes as a suspended school principal took a number of parents to court over their comments on a petition set up by the president of the school's parents and citizens association, leading to over $180,000 awarded for damages.

In Brose v Baluskas [2020] QDC 015, a Tamborine Mountain school found itself in hot water after the president of its parents and citizens association established an online petition on Change.org and created a private Facebook page calling for the Minister of Education to reinstate the school's principal, who had been suspended pending the outcome of an investigation into alleged inappropriate conduct.

While both the petition and private Facebook page garnered a mass of support for the principal, around nine percent were highly critical and unsupportive of the principal and many expressed this through emotive, provocative and abusive language, resulting in both forums being shut down after only six days.

After the principal was ultimately reinstated following the investigation into her alleged misconduct, she commenced legal proceedings against eight of the 34 individuals who had posted criticism of her on the online discussion forums, claiming $220,000 from each.

While the principal settled the matter against three individuals for a total of $182,500, another two were found to have defamed the principal and ordered to pay $3,000 each as well as being permanently restrained from making such defamatory comments again.

Conclusion

While the school was not named as a party in this case, more generally schools can be liable for the actions of their staff and agents, and even if schools are not named as a party in proceedings, there can still be considerable reputational damage for schools in matters like this.

This case serves as a timely reminder for schools to ensure they have clear and workable social media policies in place, managing their online presence and ensuring that they limit legal liability and protect their staff.

© Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers

Cooper Grace Ward is a leading Australian law firm based in Brisbane.

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please contact Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More