ARTICLE
24 March 2016

eDiscovery: 10 reasons why Technology Assisted Review is the new normal

K
KordaMentha

Contributor

KordaMentha, an independent firm in Asia-Pacific, specializes in cybersecurity, financial crime, forensic, performance improvement, real estate, and restructuring services. With a diverse team of almost 400 specialists, they provide customised solutions to help clients grow, protect from financial loss, and recover value. Trusted since 2002, they deliver bold, impactful solutions for clients.
This article discusses ten key factors in favour of TAR, that have been usefully set out in a recent English judgment.
Australia Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last month the English High Court endorsed the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) for use in large scale discovery. It's a landmark judgment which may persuade Australian courts to encourage the use of predictive coding, which has already been approved in the United States and Ireland.

Last week Owain Stone, head of KordaMentha's Forensic practice, discussed the following ten key factors in favour of TAR that were usefully set out in the English judgment:

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More