ARTICLE
9 August 2024

The Linda Reynolds vs. Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz Defamation Case

OC
O'Brien Criminal & Civil Solicitors

Contributor

O’Brien Criminal and Civil Solicitors defend people against criminal charges anywhere in Australia, as well as litigating defamation cases, and suing police and other authorities for unlawful conduct. We are a strong advocate for social justice issues and pride ourselves on our pro-bono practice. We are a growing and dynamic law firm that occasionally has vacancies for people seeking legal careers or administrative opportunities.
The defamation case is a complex legal battle rooted in serious allegations and political intrigue.
Australia Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Linda Reynolds vs. Brittany Higgins and David Sharaz Defamation Case

The Linda Reynolds, Brittany Higgins, and David Sharaz defamation case has broke Australian headlines. Firstly, Brittany Higgins accused her colleague, Bruce Lehrmann, of raping her. She said the assault happened in the Parliament House office of their then-boss, Senator Linda Reynolds, in 2019. Now, Senator Linda Reynolds has also launched a defamation action against Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz.

This allegation, which Higgins made public in 2021, sparked a series of legal disputes and intense media scrutiny. The defamation case is a complex legal battle rooted in serious allegations and political intrigue.

Lehrmann was charged with rape, but his criminal trial was abandoned due to juror misconduct. Then, the charges were eventually dropped due to concerns about Higgins' mental health. Lehrmann has consistently denied these allegations.

Following this, Lehrmann launched a defamation case against Network 10 and journalist Lisa Wilkinson. However, he lost this case.

Read our successful Defamation cases.

Claims and Counterclaims

Senator Linda Reynolds has also launched a defamation action against Brittany Higgins and her partner, David Sharaz. The defamatory content is a series of social media posts made in 2022 and 2023. She said the content damaged her reputation by suggesting she mishandled Higgins' rape allegation and failed to support her adequately.

Reynolds is particularly aggrieved by the assertion that she called Higgins a "lying cow" on the day Higgins' allegations were made public. Although Reynolds apologized and paid compensation, she insists her comments were not about the assault but about Higgins' claims of inadequate support.

Brittany Higgins' Past Defamation Cases

Brittany Higgins has been involved in multiple defamation cases. In addition to the Reynolds case, Higgins was a central figure in the defamation case Lehrmann brought against Network 10 and Lisa Wilkinson. The Federal Court ruled against Lehrmann, finding on the balance of probabilities that he did rape Higgins.

Impact on Finances and Mental Health

The legal battles have taken a significant toll on Brittany Higgins' mental health and finances. Her mental health was a critical factor in the discontinuation of the criminal trial against Lehrmann. Additionally, Higgins' legal team has argued that the ongoing defamation case has exacerbated her mental health issues. She also said it made it challenging for her to participate effectively in the legal proceedings.

Financially, the costs of defending multiple defamation cases have been substantial. David Sharaz, Higgins' partner, has already announced that he cannot afford to continue contesting the case.

Australian Defamation Laws

Defamation law in Australia aims to balance free speech with the protection of personal reputation. To prove defamation, the plaintiff must show that a publication was made to a third party that was defamatory and identified the plaintiff. The publication must also cause harm to the plaintiff's reputation in the eyes of reasonable people.

Defamation actions can be costly and complex, and damages awarded can vary significantly. The Uniform Defamation Laws govern defamation cases across Australian states and territories. However, some regions, like Western Australia, where the case is being run have not adopted the 2021 amendments.

Key Quotes and Testimonies

  • Linda Reynolds: "Every fairy tale needs a villain," said Reynolds' lawyer, Martin Bennett, arguing that Higgins and Sharaz cast Reynolds in this role for their "fictional story of political cover-up of the rape."
  • Brittany Higgins: Higgins' legal team has accused Reynolds of trying to "silence" sexual assault victims and trivializing Higgins' trauma. They argue that Reynolds' actions amounted to harassment and a failure to support Higgins adequately after the alleged assault.
  • David Sharaz: Sharaz has described the legal battle as financially crippling, stating, "I can no longer afford to pay legal costs to defend myself."

Linda Reynolds, Brittany Higgins, and David Sharaz: Defamation case

The defamation case between Linda Reynolds, Brittany Higgins, and David Sharaz is a high-stakes legal battle. It has significant implications for all involved. The defamation case highlights the complexities of defamation law in Australia.

Additionally, it underscores the profound personal and financial impacts such cases can have on individuals. As the trial continues, it remains to be seen how the court will rule. People will be watching what the broader implications will be for political and legal accountability in Australia.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More