ACCC commences proceedings against Meta for scam crypto ads on Facebook

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
Outcome of current case will have a lasting effect on practices adopted by these companies in monitoring ads.
Australia Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The ACCC has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Meta Platforms, Inc. and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited, alleging that these entities are liable for scam advertisements published by third parties on Facebook.

The proceedings

The ACCC alleges that Meta Platforms, Inc. and Meta Platforms Ireland Limited:

  • engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct by publishing scam advertisements on Facebook
  • aided and abetted or were knowingly concerned in the scammers' misleading and deceptive conduct and false representations,

in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) or the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) (ASIC Act).

The advertisements contained links that directed Facebook users to fake media articles featuring public figures, such as Dick Smith and Andrew Forrest, which gave the false impression that these individuals had endorsed particular cryptocurrency or money-making schemes.

The ACCC alleges that Meta was aware that the scam advertisements were being displayed on Facebook but did not take sufficient steps to address the issue. Further, the ACCC alleges that Meta assured users that it would detect and prevent scams and promote safety on Facebook but failed to adequately do so.

The ACCC is seeking penalties, costs and other orders against Meta.

The regulatory environment

The ACCC is taking action under both the ACL and the ASIC Act in the alternative. This is because the Court may consider that the cryptocurrency advertisements involve financial services, which are outside the scope of the ACL and instead covered by the ASIC Act.

ASIC would usually commence proceedings under the ASIC Act. However, in this case, it has delegated its powers to the ACCC.

Key takeaways

The outcome of this case will determine whether social media companies will be held liable under Australian law for advertisements published on their platforms, and is likely to have a lasting effect on the practices engaged in by these companies in monitoring such advertisements.

© Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers

Cooper Grace Ward is a leading Australian law firm based in Brisbane.

This publication is for information only and is not legal advice. You should obtain advice that is specific to your circumstances and not rely on this publication as legal advice. If there are any issues you would like us to advise you on arising from this publication, please contact Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More