ARTICLE
10 November 2015

Are you a developer? If so, you could be at risk of prosecution under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act

CG
Cooper Grace Ward

Contributor

Established in 1980, Cooper Grace Ward is a leading independent law firm in Brisbane with over 20 partners and 200 team members. They offer a wide range of commercial legal services with a focus on corporate, commercial, property, litigation, insurance, tax, and family law. Their specialized team works across various industries, providing exceptional client service and fostering a strong team culture.
The obligation to comply with the requirements of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act applies to any land in Queensland.
Australia Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Aboriginal cultural heritage can be found anywhere, even in the Brisbane CBD – there are campsites located near Roma Street Station and Victoria Park. Outside of the CBD there are numerous recorded cultural heritage sites in the South East, particularly around green field development areas such as those around Ipswich. The obligation to comply with the requirements of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (Qld) applies to everyone and applies to any land in Queensland, including freehold.

It is critical that developers comply with cultural heritage obligations because the penalties for breaches of the Act are substantial – up to $117,800 for an individual and $1,178,000 for a corporation – and you may be forced to stop ground disturbing activities under injunctions and stop work orders.

The State has prosecuted companies for failure to strictly comply with the requirements of the Act even in circumstances where:

  • the extent of the ground disturbance is small;
  • the harmed cultural heritage consisted of low density stone tool scatter (spear tips);
  • the contravention was relatively minor; and
  • the company had previously engaged with the appropriate aboriginal party to avoid harm to cultural heritage.

In 2010, the Department of Environment and Resource Management (DERM) commenced a prosecution based on a complaint made by an individual director of a registered aboriginal cultural heritage body. The individual director did so without a resolution of the board and was subsequently removed from the board. Although the aboriginal cultural heritage body requested that the prosecution be discontinued, DERM refused to do so. Subsequently, the Magistrate found the company had breached the Act and imposed an $80,000 fine without any conviction being recorded. In addition to the fine, the company was exposed to significant legal costs and costs associated with delays in the development.

Cultural heritage compliance is a necessary adjunct to any development approval and, if dealt with properly, does not have to cost a fortune or derail your project.

Cooper Grace Ward and Urbis will be hosting a seminar on this topic on Tuesday, 10 November 2015. This joint event will provide property developers with practical advice to assist with the management of cultural heritage as part of their projects.

Winner – EOWA Employer of Choice for Women Citation 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012
Winner – ALB Gold Employer of Choice 2011 and 2012
Finalist – ALB Australasian Law Awards 2008, 2010, 2011 and 2012 (Best Brisbane Firm)
Winner – BRW Client Choice Awards 2009 and 2010 - Best Australian Law Firm (revenue less than $50m)

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More