ARTICLE
2 February 2010

EPO Considers Relaxing Software Patent Rules

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

The European Patent Office is considering whether to redefine the criteria for patenting software inventions.
European Union Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The European Patent Office is considering whether to redefine the criteria for patenting software inventions.

Under current EPO rules, certain types of inventions are not patentable, even if they are new and inventive. These include software inventions that do not solve a technical problem.

The issue of how the requirement of technical aspect of a software invention should be interpreted has been the subject of much discussion for many years, not least because a different definition applies in the US enabling patents on software inventions to be obtained.

The EPO's Enlarged Board of Appeal is due to consider a referral (G3/08) on this issue. A number of interested parties, including [key industry bodies], have made their views known to the EPO in the hope of influencing its decision.

If the EPO decides to adopt a strict policy of examination, many filings for software patents will not succeed. If it decides to lower the requirements, we can expect a significant increase in European software patent filings.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 29/01/2010.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More