ARTICLE
7 October 2010

Dodd-Frank: SEC Revises Regulation FD Rule to Remove Rating Agency Exception

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
On September 29, 2010, the SEC revised Regulation FD to remove the exception that made disclosures to rating agencies for the purpose of determining or monitoring ratings not subject to Regulation FD.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On September 29, 2010, the SEC revised Regulation FD to remove the exception that made disclosures to rating agencies for the purpose of determining or monitoring ratings not subject to Regulation FD. The rule change was specifically required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and became effective on October 4, 2010.

Although such change may appear to restrict a rating agency's traditional access to corporate non-public information as part of the rating process, the practical impact is likely to be limited. Regulation FD prohibits selective disclosure by a corporation to broker-dealers, investment advisers and associated persons, certain investment managers and associated persons, investment companies, and stockholders of the corporation. A rating agency should not fall within any of these categories. Further, in its adopting release, the SEC specifically notes that the rule change does not impact the other exceptions found in Regulation FD, which include communications made to any person who expressly agrees to maintain the information in confidence. Given that many engagement letters that corporations enter into with rating agencies contain confidentiality provisions, discussions with rating agencies that include non-public information should continue to be exempt from the obligations of Regulation FD.

We recommend that corporations review their rating agency engagement letters to confirm that the confidentiality provisions cover relevant communications and that the rating agency has an express duty to maintain disclosed information in confidence. If there is any ambiguity, or the engagement letter does not contain such provisions, the corporation should enter into an amended engagement letter or a separate confidentiality agreement with the rating agency to ensure such communications continue to remain exempt from the obligations of Regulation FD.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More