ARTICLE
22 April 2009

Limitation Of Jurisdiction Of The Domestic Arbitration Tribunals

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

On 5 March 2009 the Parliament of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Bringing Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts as regards Activity of the Domestic Arbitration Tribunals and Enforcement of the Awards Rendered".
Ukraine Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 5 March 2009 the Parliament of Ukraine adopted the Law "On Bringing Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts as regards Activity of the Domestic Arbitration Tribunals and Enforcement of the Awards Rendered". The Law is effective since 31 March.

The key provisions of the above mentioned Law are as follows:

  • The domestic arbitration tribunals are prohibited from resolving the following disputes:

(a) regarding real estate and land plots;

(b) concerning establishment of legal facts;

(c) labor disputes;

(d) corporate disputes; and

(e) in the event that an arbitration award when rendered will not be enforced without the respective actions of the governmental or local authorities.

  • Parties to the arbitration agreement are free to choose place of arbitration only in the event that the dispute shall be resolved by ad hoc arbitration tribunal. Otherwise, the place of arbitration shall be considered to be the place, where the respective arbitration institution is located.
  • Facts, established by an arbitration award, do not constitute court evidences and must be re-proved before courts.
  • Third parties, involved in arbitration proceedings, are entitled to challenge an arbitration award before courts.

Persons, who were not engaged in the proceeding, may challenge an arbitration award in the event that the arbitration tribunal decided upon their rights and obligations.

The respective amendments are aimed at limiting jurisdiction of the domestic arbitration tribunals. Moreover, they are to protect companies from illegal raider attacks and fabricated arbitration proceedings.

Moreover, it is noteworthy that some fundamental amendments were introduced to the Law of Ukraine "On Enforcement Proceedings," i.e. the amended law states that an enforcement order of the court may be issued only for domestic awards, awards of the International Commercial Arbitration Court of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and Maritime Arbitration Commission of the Ukrainian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. Such wording might potentially put into risk enforcement of foreign arbitration awards in Ukraine. However, opinions of arbitration practitioners vary with respect to this issue.

Law: Law of Ukraine "On Bringing Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts as regards Activity of the Domestic Arbitration Tribunals and Enforcement of the Awards Rendered", No. 1076-VI as of 5 March 2009

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 17/04/2009.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More