Singapore: Will The Trek To An Injunction Be A More Difficult Walk In The (Wrotham) Park Now?

Last Updated: 12 September 2018
Article by Kia Jeng Koh

Negative covenants, also known as restrictive covenants, are contractual obligations not to do certain acts. They are a common feature in commercial contracts, and commonplace in banking / facility documents. For example, in the acquisition context, there will usually be non-compete and non-solicitation obligations on the part of the seller to preserve the buyer's benefit of acquiring the business. In the banking space, it is common to find negative pledge clauses. In many other contexts, non-disclosure agreements serve to protect the (often unquantifiable) value of confidential information.

In this article, we (1) recap the usual problems faced in enforcing a negative covenant; (2) summarise the legal remedy known as Wrotham Park damages (or "negotiating" damages as subsequently coined by the English court) and which was recently confirmed by the Singapore Court of Appeal in Turf Club Auto Emporium Pte Ltd and others v Yeo Boong Hua and others and anor appeal [2018] SGCA 44 to be part of the Singapore legal landscape; and (3) discuss the potential practical implications of Turf Club.

The problem

When a party breaches a negative covenant, the aggrieved innocent party often finds itself without a real or meaningful remedy. There are essentially two aspects to this legal problem.

The first aspect is the inherent difficulty in proving damages. Ordinarily, damages for breach of contract are calculated to compensate the innocent party by reference to a counterfactual in which the innocent party receives the promised performance. This principle generally works well for positive obligations, but less so for negative obligations. In many cases, a breach of a negative obligation may not cause an identifiable financial loss - at least not immediately, and usually not obviously. The whole concept of performance (which is premised on an overt act) also becomes problematic in the context of negative covenants (which is premised on not acting). The result of not being able to adequately prove loss is a Pyrrhic victory of no, or at best nominal, damages.

The second aspect relates to the discretionary nature of final injunctive relief. An injunction is usually the best way to compel the defaulting party to comply with its contractual obligation not to do something that it had agreed not to do, assuming that it is not too late to shut the proverbial stable door (as would often be the case involving a breach of a non-disclosure agreement where the horse would have bolted). However, this equitable remedy is discretionary – it is not as of right unlike orthodox damages. Factors such as delay, the "clean hands" of the plaintiff, and competing considerations are relevant to the court's exercise of discretion.

This double whammy was precisely what happened in the English case of Wrotham Park Estate Co Ltd v Parkside Homes Ltd [1974] 1 WLR 798. This case concerned a covenant not to develop land except in accordance with certain conditions. The plaintiffs conceded that the value of the land had not been diminished one farthing because of the defendant's development in breach of this negative covenant. In other words, they were unable to prove any financial loss. As for the injunction sought to restrain the development of the land, the English court ultimately declined to exercise its discretion to grant it as to do so would result in unpardonable economic waste.

Had the English court in Wrotham Park stopped there, it would seem that a party could effectively get an advantage by breaching its contractual obligation, entirely for free. This was an intuitively unjust outcome, and an unsatisfying blemish in contract law which is intended to hold parties to their agreed bargain.

The solution

In response to the injustice that the plaintiffs in Wrotham Park faced, the English High Court adopted a new measure of damages by reference to the amount that might reasonably have been demanded by the plaintiffs from the defendant for relaxing the covenant. This birthed the concept of a notional release fee / license fee, famously now known as "Wrotham Park damages".

Wrotham Park damages has been expressly confirmed to be part of the Singapore legal landscape by the Court of Appeal's decision in Turf Club. This case raised for determination, amongst other things, the remedies that should follow from the appellants' repudiatory breaches of certain express and implied terms in a consent order. In a nutshell, these terms involved not disturbing the status quo during the implementation of the consent order, not appropriating the benefit of a head lease pending full performance of the consent order, and not interfering with or hindering the valuers' discharge of their duties when they carried out valuation exercises as agreed under the consent order.

The Court of Appeal held that Wrotham Park damages was to be assessed objectively as at the date of the breach and by reference to a hypothetical bargain, rather than the parties' actual conduct and position. The Court of Appeal was also careful to set parameters for the award of this new head of damages. In the context of breaches of true negative covenants (i.e., not a positive obligation recast as a negative covenant in form), a plaintiff must meet several legal requirements:

  1. The plaintiff must first of all be caught in a true remedial lacuna. This can happen if the plaintiff did not suffer any financial loss, or if it is practically impossible to assess any such loss based on the orthodox measures. Crucially, mere difficulty in assessing such loss is insufficient. Further, specific injunctive relief is not available because the court cannot or will not grant such relief.
  2. Second, Wrotham Park damages would not be awarded if it would be irrational or totally unrealistic to expect the parties to bargain for the release of the relevant covenant, even on a hypothetical basis. An example is if the agreement to release the covenant would be illegal.

On the facts of the case in Turf Club, the Court of Appeal decided that an award of Wrotham Park damages was not appropriate as these requirements were not made out. In particular, it was still possible to assess damages on the orthodox compensatory basis.

The potential practical implications

From the perspective of the party in whose favour a negative covenant is made, the availability of an alternative head of damages for breach of such a negative covenant should be good news – more options in the armoury.

But is this really the case? The most effective legal tool to hold a defaulting party to its contractual bargain is oftentimes still an injunction. Hence, the availability of Wrotham Park damages may potentially dilute this important remedy. A defendant may now argue that since Wrotham Park damages are available under Singapore law, damages would be an adequate remedy, and injunctive relief is not justified. The availability of Wrotham Park damages may also feature generally at the stage where the court considers whether to exercise its discretion to grant an injunction.

It will be interesting to see how the law of injunctive relief in Singapore will develop in the shades of Wrotham Park damages, and how they will interface.

Whatever it is, the availability of Wrotham Park damages is something that all lenders and businesses should take into account, as this affects both covenantor and covenantee.

Dentons Rodyk acknowledges and thanks senior associate Andrea Gan for her contribution to this article.

About Dentons

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Some comments from our readers…
“The articles are extremely timely and highly applicable”
“I often find critical information not available elsewhere”
“As in-house counsel, Mondaq’s service is of great value”

Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions