CFTC Grants No-Action Relief To Japanese Swap Dealers For Certain Variation Margin Requirements

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The CFTC DSIO granted time-limited no-action relief to Japanese-regulated swap dealers from the timing requirements relating to the posting and collection of variation margin.
Japan Finance and Banking

The CFTC Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight ("DSIO") granted time-limited no-action relief to Japanese-regulated swap dealers from the timing requirements relating to the posting and collection of variation margin.

The letter provides relief for swap dealers subject to uncleared swap margin regulations of the CFTC and the Financial Services Agency of Japan, upon the following conditions:

  • the swap dealer posts or collects any variation margin amount on a T+3 basis (rather than T+1 as required by CFTC regulations);
  • the swap dealer uses its best efforts to comply with the T+1 requirements for counterparty transactions; and
  • the swap dealer complies with the T+1 requirement no later than March 1, 2020.

Commentary / Nihal Patel

As described in the letter, the relief is primarily intended to address the fact that transactions in Japanese Government Bonds ("JGBs") currently settle in 2-3 business days. However, by its terms, the relief is not limited to the posting of JGBs, but applies generally to the transfer timing requirements of the CFTC margin regulations.

The logic of the CFTC letter is curious when considering the CFTC rules as they apply to U.S. market participants. Many types of collateral eligible under the CFTC rules (including most bonds and equities) do not settle T+1. Yet when responding to U.S. market participants on this point when adopting final rules, the CFTC (and the Prudential Regulators) acknowledged that the rules required posting "so quickly" that market participants would need to take "precautionary steps" such as "pre-positioning" collateral or arranging for substitution of posted cash.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More