ARTICLE
27 August 2015

Modern Slavery Act (UK) And Supply Chain Transparency In The Construction Sector

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
For the international construction sector, modern slavery (a concept covering slavery, servitude, forced and compulsory labour and human trafficking) is a major supply chain issue...
UK Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

For the international construction sector, modern slavery (a concept covering slavery, servitude, forced and compulsory labour and human trafficking) is a major supply chain issue, particularly for those involved in large or high profile infrastructure projects in challenging labour environments. While modern slavery is a global phenomenon that all affected organisations should be actively addressing, for those subject to the reporting requirements under the UK's Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA), the issue of preventing modern slavery in supply chains is about to become very public and a compliance and public relations challenge moving forward.

Reporting requirements

Commencing October 2015, commercial organisations supplying goods or services with a minimum turnover of GBP 36 million will be required to publish on their website an annual 'slavery and human trafficking statement'. This is a statement of the steps (if any) taken to ensure modern slavery is not taking place in the organisation's business and supply chains. Given the global nature of the construction sector, the MSA is likely to have knock-on effects throughout the global supply chain.

A slavery and human trafficking statement may include (among other things): information about the organisation's policies on modern slavery; the modern slavery due diligence undertaken across its business and supply chains; the parts of its business and supply chains where there is risk of modern slavery taking place and what steps have been taken to assess and manage that risk; and the training on modern slavery available to staff. The UK Government will publish statutory guidance covering the reporting requirement and good practice for the prevention of modern slavery in supply chains to coincide with the obligation coming into effect in October.

Name and shame

Public scrutiny will provide the primary incentive for complying with reporting requirements. Negative attention from customers, shareholders, trade unions and civil society (NGOs and human rights groups) is likely to prove an effective incentive, particularly if an organisation, sector or issue is already in focus. California has similar legislation in effect and dedicated NGOs, such as KnowTheChain, are already engaged in 'public shaming' exercises, publishing details on their website of companies that are non-compliant with reporting requirements under the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act 2010. The London and New York-based Business and Human Rights Resource Centre has also been active in approaching non-compliant organisations under the Californian regime and is very likely to turn its attention to businesses who fail to comply with reporting requirements under the MSA. Organisations subject to the reporting requirement will need to ensure their slavery and human trafficking statement is underpinned by appropriate and proportionate action that it is defensible in the face of scrutiny and criticism from inside and outside of the organisation (eg, from trade unions and whistleblowers with intimate knowledge of an organisation's approach to modern slavery on the ground).

There will undoubtedly be significant differences in the approaches organisations in the construction sector take to supply chain due diligence, management and the reporting requirement given risk profiles will vary (eg, an organisation undertaking a construction project in the UK will have a lower risk profile for modern slavery than an organisation undertaking public works in a jurisdiction where labour practices for migrant workers have been historically poor). Procurement policies addressing modern slavery, contractual protections in supply contracts, clear labour and whistleblowing policies and consistent messaging throughout the supply chain will be important wherever organisations are operating. However, for those organisations operating in high risk jurisdictions, enhanced due diligence and the implementation of more stringent preventative measures will undoubtedly be required.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More