ARTICLE
6 February 2015

Amendment Of The EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive

EN
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC

Contributor

Elias Neocleous & Co LLC is the largest law firm in Cyprus and a leading firm in the South-East Mediterranean region, with a network of offices across Cyprus (Limassol, Nicosia, Paphos), Belgium (Brussels), Czech Republic (Prague), Romania (Budapest) and Ukraine (Kiev). A dynamic team of lawyers and legal experts deliver strategic legal solutions to clients operating in key industries across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, India, USA, South America, and China. The firm is renowned for its expertise and jurisdictional knowledge across a broad spectrum of practice areas, spanning all major transactional and market disciplines, while also managing the largest and most challenging cross-border assignments. It is a premier practice of choice for leading Cypriot banks and financial institutions, preeminent foreign commercial and development banks, multinational corporations, global technology firms, international law firms, private equity funds, credit agencies, and asset managers.
As expected, at its meeting on 27 January 2015 the Council of the European Union adopted a directive amending the EU parent-subsidiary directive (2011/96/EU) by adding an anti-abuse clause.
European Union Wealth Management
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As expected, at its meeting on 27 January 2015 the Council of the European Union adopted a directive amending the EU parent-subsidiary directive (2011/96/EU) by adding an anti-abuse clause aimed at preventing the parent-subsidiary directive from being misused for the purposes of tax avoidance, and achieving consistency in its application in different member states.

The parent-subsidiary directive is intended to ensure that profits made by cross-border groups are not taxed twice. It requires member states to exempt from taxation profits received by parent companies from their subsidiaries in other member states.

The anti-abuse clause will allow member states to deny the benefits of the directive to so-called "artificial" arrangements – that is, arrangements that have been put into place in order to obtain a tax advantage without reflecting economic reality. It takes the form of a "de minimis" rule, allowing member states to apply stricter national rules as long as they meet minimum EU requirements.

Based on the draft published by the European Council in December 2014 the amendments made to the parent-subsidiary Directive are expected to read as follows:

In Directive 2011/96/EU, Article 1(2) is replaced by the following paragraphs:

"2. Member States shall not grant the benefits of this Directive to an arrangement or a series of arrangements which, having been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage that defeats the object or purpose of this Directive, are not genuine having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances.
An arrangement may comprise more than one step or part.

3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, an arrangement or a series of arrangements shall be regarded as not genuine to the extent that they are not put into place for valid commercial reasons which reflect economic reality.

4. This Directive shall not preclude the application of domestic or agreement-based provisions required for the prevention of tax evasion, tax fraud or abuse."

Member states will have until 31 December 2015 to introduce an anti-abuse rule into national law. The same deadline applies for transposition of the July 2014 amendments to tackle hybrid loan mismatches.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More