British Virgin Islands: UK Privy Council Decision On Fund Redemption Process In Fairfield Sentry Limited

Readers will no doubt be familiar with Bernard L. Madoff's Ponzi scheme perpetuated through his firm Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("BLMIS"), his 2009 conviction and the multiplicity of litigation affecting shareholders and former shareholders in what were (although not always described as such) feeder funds invested in BLMIS.

A variety of interesting issues relating to the redemption process of funds arose out of legal actions initiated by the liquidators of Fairfield Sentry Limited ("Fairfield"), against persons who had redeemed out of Fairfield prior to the discovery of the Madoff fraud and were eventually dealt with by the UK Privy Council (the "Privy Council") on 16 April, 2014. The Privy Council decision can be seen as a clear, sensible and much welcome one, particularly for redeemed former shareholders.

Fairfield Sentry Limited

Fairfield (now in liquidation) was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands as a mutual fund and during the period from 1997 to 2008 it was the single largest investor with BLMIS with estimated investments of approximately US$7.2 billion. The liquidator of Fairfield initiated a large number of actions against former shareholders who had redeemed prior to the fraud being discovered in an effort to recover amounts paid to them on redemption of their shares on the basis that the redemption amounts were paid in the mistaken belief that the value attributed to the investments in BLMIS were correct, when in fact no such assets ever existed. The liquidator was in effect seeking to have the previously issued Net Asset Value ("NAV") per share reduced to US$0 and to have all former shareholders ("Redeemed Shareholders") to return the net proceeds of their redemptions from Fairfield to the liquidator.

A number of affected former shareholders applied to the Commercial Division of the High Court of the British Virgin Islands (the "Commercial Court") on a number of preliminary issues. The Commercial Court considered four preliminary issues in respect of Fairfield, three of which were considered together. These three preliminary issues concerned whether or not certain transaction documents issued to shareholders in Fairfield which recorded the NAV per share or the redemption price upon redemption were binding on Fairfield under its memorandum and articles of association ("Articles") and therefore could be considered 'certificates' for the purpose of the Articles (the "Certificate Issue"). The fourth preliminary issue concerned whether the defendants had given good consideration when surrendering their shares in return for the redemption proceeds (the "Good Consideration Issue"). In the Commercial Court, Bannister J. found that the documents issued by Fairfield which recorded the NAV per share or the redemption price upon redemption were not 'certificates' for the purposes of its Articles but did find that shareholders had provided 'good consideration' for their shares. The decision of the Commercial Court was subsequently upheld by the East Caribbean Court of Appeal and then appealed by to the Privy Council.

Privy Council Considerations

In assessing the Certificate Issue, the Privy Council looked to the Articles of Fairfield and to the construction and intent of its provisions with respect to the subscription and redemption process. The Privy Council made it clear that the subscription form utilised by all investors in Fairfield when subscribing for shares binds the subscriber to the subscription form and the terms of Fairfield's Offering Memorandum and Articles. The Privy Council was of the view that the terms governing a shareholders membership of Fairfield and the redemption of its shares were to be found in the Articles. The key question that arose was whether the NAV per share of Fairfield could be revised on the basis that, as the liquidator argued, because no certificate had been issued in accordance with the Articles the NAV per share had been finally determined.

In the ordinary course of its operations, Fairfield's administrator, Citco Fund Services (Europe) BV ("Citco") had issued and published various documents to all shareholders on a monthly basis which detailed (i) monthly final Net Asset Values; (ii) monthly balance statements including opening and closing NAV per share for each month and a summary of any subscriptions or redemptions made during the relevant month. In addition, Citco provided contract notes in respect of redemptions made from Fairfield. The defendants (i.e. the Redeemed Shareholders) argued that all of these documents issued by Citco, constituted 'certificates' for the purposes of the Articles. This argument was not accepted by the Commercial Court. The Privy Council also had regard to the issue of restitution and in this regard, the Privy Council identified the decision in Kleinwort Benson Ltd v Lincoln City Council [199] 2 AC 349 where it was found that the payee of money:

"...cannot be said to have been unjustly enriched if he was entitled to receive the sum paid to him"

Consequently, in the event that shareholders had no entitlement to the amount received or the payment received exceeded the amount owed then Fairfield would have been in a position where it could have sought recovery of the redemption proceeds. Therefore, the importance of valuation of Fairfield became an important matter. The Privy Council addressed the issue of the final determination of the NAV per share and clearly stated that the claim to recover any redemption payments depended on whether Fairfield was bound by the redemption terms to make the redemption payments. This question would be decided by determining whether Fairfield was obliged to pay (i) the true NAV per share based on the information which came to light arising out of the discovery of the Madoff fraud; or (ii) the NAV per share which was determined by the directors of Fairfield at the time of the redemptions made.

In its analysis, the Privy Council reviewed the Articles and found that they set down the method for determining the amount due and the timings of payment to redeeming shareholders and once the NAV per share was ascertained, then redemptions would be made at the finalised redemption price. The importance of the price being definitively finalised was highlighted and the Privy Council stated that any other conclusion was unworkable.

The Privy Council rejected the liquidator's argument that the final determination of the NAV per share was not completed until a certificate was issued. Importantly, it found that the documents issued by Citco in the ordinary course of Fairfield's relationship with its shareholders constituted 'certificates' for the purposes of the Articles. The Privy Council found that the documents had (i) conveyed information to shareholders from Fairfield; (ii) the documents were issued by Citco under the authority of the directors of Fairfield; and (iii) the documents were intended to be definitive. In finding the documents issued by Citco constituted 'certificates' the Privy Council provided that:

"As a matter of language, a "certificate" ordinarily means (i) a statement in writing, (ii) issued by an authoritative source, which (iii) is communicated by whatever method to a recipient or class of recipient intended to rely on it, and (iv) conveys information, (v) in a form or context that it is intended to be definitive. There is no reason to think that a document must satisfy any further formal requirements, unless its purpose or legal context plainly requires them..."

The Privy Council held that it was essential that the redemption price should be definitive at the time of the transaction and the relevant valuation day and that to suggest otherwise would be to expose redeemed investors to an open-ended liability to repay part of the price received in the event that the assets were subsequently determined to be less than the amount thought at the time of redemption. In addition, any such assessment would leave redeemed shareholders with the open- ended opportunity to seek recovery in the event that it subsequently transpired that the shares redeemed were worth more than they were redeemed for at the time. The Privy Council found this position to be unacceptable.

Accordingly, the Privy Council overturned the decisions of the Commercial Court and the East Caribbean Court of Appeal on the Certificate Issue and dismissed the appeal on the Good Consideration Issue. In doing so it provided a very significant blow to the liquidators of Fairfield and other liquidators seeking to utilise similar claw-back arguments.

Impact of the decision

The decision is a watershed moment for many investors who invested in Madoff feeder schemes such as Fairfield. It clearly sets down a mark in the sand, especially within Common law jurisdictions, regarding the treatment of investors who in good faith redeemed their shares in investment funds prior to the discovery of fraud. The decision also demonstrates that when considering the constitutional documents (memorandum and articles of association, trust deeds etc.), regard should be had to their plain meaning while taking into account overarching legal principles. It also highlights that operational factors can be relied upon when interpreting such documents (i.e. issuance of 'certificates'). Accordingly, this decision will be of interest not just to those former shareholders of entities such as Fairfield and similar entities but also to promoters and managers of investment funds when they are considering establishing investment funds so as to ensure that there is certainty around the determination of the NAV per share.

While the Privy Council's decision is related to the law of the British Virgin Islands, it will without doubt be cited in any similar cases before Common law courts (including potentially the Irish courts) and indeed may have serious repercussions for many similar cases which have been stayed pending the outcome of the Fairfield decision. It is a very positive judgement for redeemed shareholders in cases such as Fairfield but will obviously be of little comfort to those investors who remained invested in Fairfield at the time of the Madoff fraud discovery.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of

To Use you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions