ARTICLE
17 October 2019

Supreme Court Declines To Review Ninth Circuit Decision In Robles v. Domino's, Exposing Businesses To More Website Accessibility Lawsuits

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court Leaves the Ninth Circuit's Robles v. Domino's decision intact, dashing businesses' hope for some relief from website accessibility lawsuits.
United States Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Supreme Court Leaves the Ninth Circuit's Robles v. Domino's decision intact, dashing businesses' hope for some relief from website accessibility lawsuits.

The Supreme Court today issued its much anticipated decision on Domino's Pizza's Petition for Certiorari in the Robles v. Domino's website accessibility case, and it is not good news for businesses. The Supreme Court declined to review the Ninth Circuit's decision holding that (1) Title III of the ADA covers websites with a nexus to a physical place of public accommodation, and (2) imposing liability on businesses for not having an accessible website does not violate the due process rights of public accommodations even in the absence of website accessibility regulations. The denial of certiorari means the case will go back to the District Court to be litigated on the merits. We predict the case will settle soon after remand.

Business groups had hoped that the Supreme Court would take up the Domino's case and issue a decision that would end — or at least minimize — the tsunami of website accessibility lawsuits that have hit public accommodations nationwide. That has not happened, leaving the business community with no real options for relief. The Department of Justice has no plan to issue any regulations on website accessibility and the likelihood that Congress will take any legislative action is low. The decision is a significant victory for disability rights advocates and the cottage industry of plaintiff's lawyers who will likely celebrate with more lawsuit filings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More