ARTICLE
17 August 2009

Title V Permit Program: Navigating The Enforcement Traps Of The Clean Air Act

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
EPA continues its aggressive enforcement of the Clean Air Act (CAA) utilizing the certification process of the Title V program to address past non-compliance with key air rules and regulations.
United States Environment

EPA continues its aggressive enforcement of the Clean Air Act (CAA) utilizing the certification process of the Title V program to address past non-compliance with key air rules and regulations. EPA Region V's recent Notice of Violation (NOV) to Oxbow Midwest Calcining LLC (Oxbow) illustrates its legal posture and the need for companies to verify that Title V applications fully describe the operations and emissions, and disclose any past non-compliance including any historic non-compliance — whether by the current operator or a past operator — with the new source review requirements.

In the June 16, 2009 NOV issued to Oxbow, EPA asserted that, in 1998, the prior owner of the facility replaced an economizer on the primary emission unit without obtaining a new source review permit and without installing the Best Available Control Technology (BACT). The facility was subsequently sold to Oxbow in June 2008. Oxbow applied for and was reissued a Title V permit on June 8, 2008. EPA now asserts in the recent NOV that Oxbow violated the CAA by operating the facility without going through new source review, installing BACT, or disclosing the 1998 events in its Title V application.

The enforcement approach exhibited in the Oxbow NOV reinforces several key points:

In applying for a Title V permit, it is essential to submit a complete application that accurately describes the operations of and emissions from the facility. Simply importing prior information into a current application without verifying the current accuracy of the information — such as the chemicals emitted or the emission rates — is done at one's own risk.

Prior to certifying the compliance status of the facility as part of the application process, one needs to undertake a thorough review of compliance with all air-related requirements, including historic compliance with the new source review regulations.

Failure to disclose non-compliance or fully describe the operations and emissions may result in an invalid operating permit and sanctions for operating without a valid Title V permit.

Meeting the requirements of the Title V permit program is key to successfully navigating the enforcement traps in the CAA and its rules and regulations. If properly applied for and issued, the Title V permit can serve as a basis for outlining the compliance requirements of the facility. However, if the information in the application does not meet the test of disclosing all relevant and appropriate information, or the certification fails to disclose non-compliance, then the enforcement ramifications may be significant.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More