Design Thinking For Litigators

SH
Stites & Harbison PLLC

Contributor

A full-service law firm representing clients across the United States and internationally, Stites & Harbison, PLLC is known as a preeminent firm managing sophisticated transactions, challenging litigation and complex regulatory matters on a daily basis.  The firm represents a broad spectrum of clients including multinational corporations, financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, health care organizations, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and individuals. Stites & Harbison has 10 offices across five states.
Design thinking is considered by its adherents to be a "systematic approach to innovation and problem solving that is, fundamentally: user centered, experimental, responsive, intentional, and tolerant of failure."
United States Consumer Protection

Design thinking is considered by its adherents to be a "systematic approach to innovation and problem solving that is, fundamentally: user centered, experimental, responsive, intentional, and tolerant of failure." The Harvard Business Review framed design thinking as a kind of social technology which by "shaping the experiences of the innovators, and of their key stakeholders and implementers, at every step."2 Design thinking has been used by engineers and architects for decades, and has more recently been adopted in fields like business and health care. It has not yet caught on in the legal profession, which is typically slower to innovate.

Click here to read this entire article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More