ARTICLE
2 January 2019

Federal Circuit Patent Update - December 31, 2018

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
Chen, J. Affirming the PTAB's decision that the patent applicant's claims were correctly rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter.
United States Intellectual Property
Precedential Federal Circuit Opinion

1 IN RE: MARCO GULDENAAR HOLDING B.V. [OPINION - PRECEDENTIAL] (2017-2465, 12/28/2018) (Chen, Mayer and Bryson)

Chen, J. Affirming the PTAB's decision that the patent applicant's claims were correctly rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 for claiming patent-ineligible subject matter. The Court explained that the rejected claims were directed to the abstract idea of rules for playing a dice game and the only arguable inventive concept related to the dice markings, which are patent-ineligible printed matter. Judge Mayer concurred in the judgment.

For more information, including commentary and copies of briefs and decisions on current hot topics in IP law, visit  wilmerhale.com/en/solutions/intellectual-property-litigation

For patent cases in which petitions for certiorari have been granted, are pending, or have recently been denied, visit  wilmerhale.com/en/solutions/appellate-and-supreme-court-litigation.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More