ARTICLE
27 December 2018

Trade Secrets: Texas Court Of Appeals Rules Plaintiffs May Not Obtain Access In Discovery To Defendants' Trade Secret Software To Permit Analysis By Plaintiffs' Expert Witness

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
The trial court agreed and ordered the defendant to produce its trade secret software to the plaintiffs.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a fatal motorcycle accident case, the Texas Court of Appeals, Ninth District, last month denied plaintiffs access to and the use of the defendants' proprietary software program to analyze the allegedly defective power steering system in the defendants' motorcycle, on the ground that the software was a trade secret.

In In re Kongsberg Inc., the plaintiffs claimed the power steering system of the motorcycle manufactured by one of the defendants had malfunctioned, causing the fatal accident. During discovery one of the defendants used its trade secret software to analyze the electronic activity in the power steering system during the accident. After doing so, the defendant provided a readout of the error codes and steering inputs to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs' expert reviewed this software analysis of the steering system and then claimed he needed personal access to the underlying software to conduct his own independent analysis of the accident data. The trial court agreed and ordered the defendant to produce its trade secret software to the plaintiffs.

The Ninth District Court of Appeals reversed the discovery order because the plaintiffs could not show that accessing the trade secret software program was "necessary for a fair adjudication" of the case. The court reasoned that because the plaintiffs' expert had already determined that the power steering system was at fault, the expert did not need any additional information that could be generated by analyzing the defendants' trade secret software.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More