United States: United Nations Further Deliberates A Treaty Seeking To Impose Corporate Liability For Human Rights Violations

Since 2015, a United Nations working group has met annually to negotiate and draft a multilateral treaty that addresses human rights violations committed by businesses. The most recent of these annual meetings was held from October 15 to 19, 2018, at which a first draft of the treaty was debated.

The debates at these working group meetings reveal that much of the focus of the treaty process is to hold multinational corporations ("MNCs") liable for human rights violations that arise within their global operations, including the operations of a MNCs' multi-tiered business partners. While the proposed treaty has not yet been finalized, this UN effort continues to be a matter of keen debate and interest amongst stakeholders within the business community and broader civil society.

Background to the Proposed Treaty

The proposed treaty arrives on the scene against the backdrop of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the "UN Guiding Principles"), which, since their advent in 2011, constitute the authoritative set of guidelines for governments and businesses to address, mitigate, and, as necessary and appropriate, remedy human rights abuses committed within business operations.1 MNCs have made great strides in complying with these UN Guiding Principles, implementing a wide array of thoughtful policies and practices to address human rights violations in their operations.2

Nevertheless, in June 2014, a plurality of the UN Human Rights Council member states, led by Ecuador and South Africa, established a working group named the "Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group on Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Respect to Human Rights" ("the IWG") "to elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises."3 The IWG's first meeting took place in July 2015, the second in October 2016, and the third in October 2017. During these three sessions, the potential function and content of a treaty was broadly debated among State and non-governmental organization (NGO) delegates, academics, practitioners, and a handful of business representatives.4 While no draft treaty was produced in the first and second sessions, the third session's debates surrounded an "Elements Paper," which was the first attempt at drafting – albeit in a skeletal fashion – a potential treaty.5

First Draft of the Proposed Treaty is Published in Advance of the IWG's Fourth Session

In mid-2018, in advance of the IWG's fourth session, the Chairperson of the IWG published a "Zero Draft" of the treaty with an accompanying "Draft Optional Protocol." The Zero Draft largely expands on the points asserted in the third session's "Elements Paper." It requires ratifying States, through their domestic laws, to both hold "natural and legal persons ... criminally, civil [sic], or administratively liable for violations of human rights undertaken in the context of business activities of transnational character" and ensure that "all persons with business activities of transnational character" undertake human rights due diligence "throughout such business activities." The Draft Optional Protocol mainly seeks to create a National Implementation Mechanism for ratifying States for purposes of implementing the obligations stated in the Zero Draft.

The text of the Zero Draft and Draft Optional Protocol (together the "Proposed Treaty"), as well as the debates at the fourth session6 surrounding these documents, reveals several areas of significant concern for employers with international operations.

MNCs are the Exclusive Target

The "Scope" of the Proposed Treaty covers "human rights violations in the context of any business activities of a transnational character."7 "Business activities of a transnational character" is further defined as "any for-profit economic activit[ies] ... undertaken by a natural or legal person ... that take place or involve actions, persons or impact in two or more national jurisdictions."8 Thus, purely domestic companies and State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) that are often not strictly profit-driven, are excluded from the Proposed Treaty's scope. The Proposed Treaty also allows States to "exempt certain small and medium-sized undertakings" – regardless of their transnational activities – from any obligation to conduct human rights due diligence.9 These provisions thus target MNCs and exempt domestic and state-owned enterprises.

MNCs are Required to Conduct Due Diligence of Entities that are not Under their Direct Control

The Proposed Treaty requires States to impose due diligence requirements on MNCs, including monitoring human rights impacts, assessing human rights risks, preventing human rights violations, and conducting human rights impact assessments – flowing from the MNCs' own business activities, as well as the activities of their "subsidiaries and ... entities under its direct or indirect control."10 Failure to comply with these due diligence requirements will "result in commensurate liability and compensation ...."11 Thus, the Proposed Treaty contemplates that a MNC police the activities of business partners who may be situated multiple levels within a so-called supply chain and may neither be visible nor have any contractual relationship with the MNC.

Accepted Due Diligence Standards are Rejected in Favor of "Outcome-Based" Standards

In a significant departure from the UN Guiding Principles, the Proposed Treaty's due diligence process requires that MNCs actually prevent human rights abuses, or be held liable.12 The UN Guiding Principles, on the other hand, presented human rights due diligence as a process in which companies take adequate measures to seek to prevent, mitigate and account for human rights impacts. The Proposed Treaty seeks to transform due diligence from a process-based standard to an outcome-based standard, which may be overly difficult or impossible to satisfy.

Liability is Potentially Extended to MNCs' Directors and Shareholders

The Proposed Treaty attempts to "pierce the corporate veil" in seeking to impose liability on a broad, undefined swath of individuals within MNCs. As the article on "Legal Liability" makes clear, ratifying States are required to hold "natural and legal persons" liable under civil, criminal, and administrative laws for human rights violations "undertaken in the context of business activities of transnational character."13 This language opens the door for States to hold liable MNCs' directors or even shareholders based on the individual State's definition of such legal standards as proximate cause, mens rea, and actus reus.

The Rights to be Protected are Unclear

The definition of the rights to be protected under the Proposed Treaty is muddled. The article on "Scope" states that "all international human rights and those rights recognized under domestic law" are covered. However, the phrase "all international human rights" is not a recognized category of laws under international law. Moreover, the second phrase, "rights recognized under domestic law," raises the question – unanswered by the Proposed Treaty – of how possible tensions and contradictions between international and national standards are to be reconciled. Adding to this confusion, in seemingly random sections, the Proposed Treaty mentions "environmental rights,"14 without explaining how such rights fall within the mandate of the IWG or how they relate to the human rights mentioned in the article on "Scope."

Broad Extraterritorial Jurisdiction is Granted to Ratifying States' Courts

The Proposed Treaty reflects a broad conception of extraterritorial jurisdiction, to allow plaintiffs access to the courts of companies' home nations, even though the alleged harm to the claimants occurred in other nations.15 It also allows a court in the country where the harm occurred to exercise jurisdiction over companies domiciled abroad where those companies allegedly committed abuses in the nation where that court sits.16 In this latter instance, the Proposed Treaty further allows, at the request of victims, that the court apply the law of the home State of the defendant, and not the law of the State in which the court sits.17

This concept runs contrary to the UN Guiding Principles' position: "States are not generally required under international human rights law to regulate the extraterritorial activities of businesses domiciled in their territory and/or jurisdiction."18

What Next?

The fourth session did not provide a clear indication as to the IWG's next steps in developing the Proposed Treaty. Indeed, there does not appear to be a consensus on the part of the States on the content of the Proposed Treaty, or on the treaty process in general. Indeed, some countries like the U.S. and Canada have opted out of participating in any of the IWG's sessions. Other countries like Russia and China, as well as the E.U., while present at the sessions, have voiced serious concerns about the Proposed Treaty and the treaty process. Yet another group of countries, including Ecuador, South Africa and Namibia, have been generally supportive of the treaty process and much of the substance of the Proposed Treaty.

It is possible that the IWG will seek to publish another draft of the Proposed Treaty in the hope of achieving a broader consensus among States. This may mean that a new draft will be further debated at the IWG's session in 2019.

Even though these debates may continue, the Proposed Treaty serves as additional notice that business and human rights legislation will continue to be aggressively pursued in sub-national, national, and supranational legislatures. Indeed, the broad reach for liability suggested in the Proposed Treaty may serve as guide posts for national governments that are seeking to reform their laws – regardless of whether they ratify a treaty. In fact, many countries—including the home nations of many MNCs—have already enacted various laws to that very end. These include mandatory disclosure laws such as the California Transparency in Supply Chains Act, the U.K. Modern Slavery Act, and mandatory due diligence laws such as the French law requiring companies to create and implement a "vigilance plan" aimed at identifying and preventing potential human rights violations, including those associated with subsidiaries. The Proposed Treaty, if finalized, will potentially add to this complex array of human rights obligations placed on companies.


1. United Nations, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, available at http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf [hereinafter "UNGP"].

2. For a survey of various corporate efforts to comply with the UN Guiding Principles, see U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Eliminating Human Trafficking: The Case for Corporate Self-Regulation, available at https://www.uschamber.com/sites/default/files/eliminating_human_trafficking_-_a_case_for_corporate_self-regulation.pdf; see also Modern Slavery Registry, Business and Human Rights Resource Center, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/uk-modern-slavery-act-registry; Lavanga V. Wijekoon & Michael G. Congiu, Imposing Liability on Employers Under the Shadow of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business & Human Rights, in EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE, 2017 EDITION 4-5 (2017) (describing the steps employers have taken to implement UN Guiding Principles).

3. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner, Open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights, available at http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/WGTransCorp/Pages/IGWGOnTNC.aspx.

4. Littler Mendelson attorneys Michael Congiu and Lavanga Wijekoon participated in these sessions.

5. See Lavanga Wijekoon, Michael Congiu, Stefan Marculewicz, and John Kloosterman, United Nations Continues its Development of a Treaty Imposing Liability on Companies for Human Rights Abuses, Littler Insight (Nov. 9, 2017).

6. Littler Mendelson attorney Lavanga Wijekoon participated in this fourth session.

7. U.N. Human Rights Council, Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises (2018) [hereinafter "Zero Draft"], Article 3.1, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/WGTransCorp/Session3/DraftLBI.pdf.

8. Zero Draft, Article 4.2.

9. Zero Draft, Article 9.5.

10. Zero Draft, Art 9.2.

11. Zero Draft, Art. 9.4.

12. Zero Draft, Art. 9.2.c and 9.4.

13. Zero Draft, Art. 10.1.

14. Zero Draft, Art. 2.d, 2.e, 4.1, 8.1.b.

15. Zero Draft, Art. 5.1.

16. Id.

17. Zero Draft, Art. 7.2.

18. UNGP at 2.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions