ARTICLE
16 September 2018

Third Circuit Permits Removal To Federal Court By A Forum Defendant Before Formal Service

SH
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Contributor

Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP logo
Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
In what appears to be the first ever appellate court ruling on the issue, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the forum-defendant rule does not prohibit a defendant from removing a case to federal court ...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Brittany C. Wakim published "Why The 3rd Circuit Allowed Removal In Encompass" on Law360, assessing the impact of this precedential opinion for jurisdictional and removal issues.

"In what appears to be the first ever appellate court ruling on the issue, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that the forum-defendant rule does not prohibit a defendant from removing a case to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction before the plaintiff formally serves the forum state defendant. Encompass Ins. Co. v. Stone Mansions Restaurant Inc. is an important decision for businesses and others to closely examine."

Read the full article online here. (Subscription required).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More