CONTRIBUTOR
ARTICLE
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Background – We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 108 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2008.

Overview

The results of the 2Q08 survey show that companies raising venture capital in 2Q08 continued to receive higher valuations than in their prior round. The highlights of the quarter are as follows:

  • Up rounds exceeded down rounds for the 18th consecutive quarter (68% up vs. 13% down, with 19% flat).

  • The Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer" showed a 53% average price increase for companies receiving venture capital in 2Q08 compared to such companies' prior financing round. While such increase is certainly healthy, the average increase for the first half of 2008 was the lowest six month increase since Q2/Q3 of 2006. Companies receiving the largest increases in valuation were primarily Web 2.0 and secondarily Cleantech.

Other U.S. venture industry related results for the second quarter include the following:

  • The amount invested in U.S. venture-backed companies in 2Q08 was approximately $6.9 billion in 622 transactions, compared to $7.4 billion invested in 657 transactions in 1Q08. The amount invested in 2Q08 was substantial, but at the low end of the range we're seen over the past 2-3 years. 1

  • An industry sector analysis shows that the decline in venture investment was primarily in the healthcare and IT sectors, offset in part by increased investments in Web 2.0 and Cleantech companies. 1

  • Acquisitions of venture backed companies in 2Q08 decreased noticeably, with 56 transactions totaling $4.7 billion, compared to 86 transactions totaling $11.3 billion in 1Q08. M&A activity in 2Q08 was the lowest since 4Q04. 1

  • There were no IPOs of venture backed companies in 2Q08, compared to 6 IPOs raising $0.4 billion in 4Q07.

  • Nasdaq was basically flat for 2Q08 but is up approximately 7% in 3Q08 through August 11, 2008.

Financing Round – The financings broke down according to the following rounds:

Series

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

A

15%

17%

16%

13%

14%

18%

22%

23%

B

31%

29%

26%

38%

34%

38%

31%

31%

C

20%

22%

27%

28%

25%

20%

23%

24%

D

19%

13%

16%

12%

18%

12%

11%

17%

E and higher

15%

19%

15%

9%

9%

12%

13%

5%

Price Change – The direction of price changes for companies receiving financing this quarter, compared to their previous round, were as follows:

Price Change

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

Down

13%

19%

22%

14%

11%

9%

22%

24%

Flat

19%

9%

9%

7%

8%

12%

11%

9%

Up

68%

72%

69%

79%

81%

79%

67%

67%

The percentage of down rounds by series were as follows:

Series

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

B

3%

16%

11%

13%

5%

7%

6%

13%

C

23%

25%

11%

14%

10%

4%

15%

24%

D

14%

29%

47%

8%

17%

0%

42%

38%

E and higher

19%

10%

33%

33%

27%

36%

53%

33%

The Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer" (Magnitude of Price Change) –Set forth below is (i) for up rounds, the average per share percentage increase over the previous round, (ii) for down rounds, the average per share percentage decrease over the previous round, and (iii) the overall average per share percentage change from the previous round for all rounds taken together. Such information is broken down by series for Q2'08 and is provided on an aggregate basis for comparison purposes for the prior four quarters. In calculating the "net result" for all rounds, "flat rounds" are included. For purposes of these calculations, all financings are considered equal, and accordingly the results are not weighted for the amount raised in a financing.

Percent Change

Series B

Series C

Series D

Series E and higher

Combined total for all Series for Q2'08

Combined total for all Series for Q1'08

Combined total for all Series for Q4'07

Combined total for all Series for Q3'07

Combined total for all Series for Q2'07

Up rounds

+119%

+93%

+64%

+45%

+91%

+78%

+91%

+108%

+99%

Down rounds

-11%

-72%

-36%

-63%

-56%

-36%

-36%

-46%

-46%

Net result

+93%

+47%

+37%

+11%

+53%

+49%

+55%

+79%

+74%

Liquidation Preference – Senior liquidation preferences were used in the following percentages of financings:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

38%

47%

39%

42%

51%

36%

40%

42%

The percentage of senior liquidation preference by series was as follows:

Series

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

B

21%

38%

26%

23%

47%

30%

23%

30%

C

32%

46%

43%

48%

39%

25%

38%

41%

D

62%

36%

53%

69%

65%

50%

58%

57%

E and higher

50%

70%

40%

67%

74%

64%

67%

67%

Multiple Liquidation Preferences - The percentage of senior liquidation preferences that were multiple preferences were as follows:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

11%

17%

15%

21%

15%

14%

14%

26%

Of the senior liquidation preferences, the ranges of the multiples broke down as follows:

Range of multiples

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

>1x- 2x

75%

100%

80%

100%

75%

100%

40%

90%

>2x – 3x

25%

0%

20%

0%

25%

0%

60%

10%

> 3x

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

Participation in Liquidation - The percentages of financings that provided for participation were as follows:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

57%

60%

59%

54%

48%

59%

73%

64%

Of the financings that had participation, the percentages that were not capped were as follows:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

55%

56%

41%

39%

54%

52%

64%

58%

Cumulative Dividends – Cumulative dividends were provided for in the following percentages of financings:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

6%

5%

4%

4%

6%

8%

4%

7%

Antidilution Provisions - The uses of antidilution provisions in the financings were as follows:

Type of Provision

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

Ratchet

1%

2%

3%

6%

5%

5%

4%

4%

Weighted Average

99%

98%

97%

94%

93%

94%

95%

95%

None

0%

0%

0%

0%

2%

0%

1%

1%

Pay-to-Play Provisions - The use of pay-to-play provisions in the financings was as follows:

Percentages of financings having pay-to-play provisions.

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

7%

6%

9%

13%

10%

8%

10%

10%

The pay-to-play provisions provided for conversion of non-participating investors' preferred stock into common stock or shadow preferred stock, in the percentages set forth below:

- Common Stock.

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

87%

67%

89%

57%

77%

89%

73%

50%

- Shadow Preferred Stock.

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

13%

33%

11%

43%

23%

11%

27%

50%

Redemption – The percentages of financings providing for mandatory redemption or redemption at the option of the venture capitalist were as follows:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

29%

20%

21%

26%

22%

26%

22%

29%

Corporate Reorganizations - The percentages of post-Series A financings involving a corporate reorganization were as follows:

Q2'08

Q1'08

Q4'07

Q3'07

Q2'07

Q1'07

Q4'06

Q3'06

4%

5%

5%

9%

3%

9%

6%

5%

Footnote

1 Information in this paragraph obtained from Dow Jones VentureSource.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

AUTHOR(S)
Barry Kramer
Fenwick
Michael Patrick
Fenwick
POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Finance and Banking from United States
SEC Adopts Third Set Of Amendments To Form PF
Dechert
The latest round of revisions to Form PF made a stealthy arrival, with the SEC announcing in mid-February that it adopted the updates without an in-person vote.
Kirschner: The Final Act?
Mayer Brown
On August 24, 2023, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its decision in the Kirschner v. JPMorgan litigation saga, rejecting the plaintiff's...
Implications Of An Early Extension Of A 364-Day Credit Facility
Mayer Brown
Because banks receive favorable capital treatment when a credit facility's tenor is shorter than one year, lenders increasingly offer financing with 364-day tenors and uncommitted extension option terms of up to 364 days.
Financial Markets And Funds Quick Take | Issue 25
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Katten's Financial Markets and Funds Quick Take is a monthly newsletter highlighting key noteworthy developments potentially affecting financial markets and funds.
Private Credit And Traditional Banks Forge A New Path
Dechert
As direct lending becomes a more popular financing option for middle-market and large U.S. companies, banks are increasingly seeking new ways to leverage their existing customer networks to participate in the direct lending market.
Not Off The Hook: The SEC Addresses Its Position On Exculpation And Indemnification For Private Fund Advisers
Proskauer Rose LLP
In its final Private Fund Adviser Rules adopted last year, the SEC dropped one of the more controversial proposed rules—the proposal to prohibit contractual exculpation or indemnification...
FREE News Alerts
Sign Up for our free News Alerts - All the latest articles on your chosen topics condensed into a free bi-weekly email.
Upcoming Events
Mondaq Social Media