United States: Supreme Court Seeks Input Of United States In International Price-Fixing Case

Nicholas B. Melzer is a partner and Janet Chung is an attorney in Holland & Knight's Los Angeles office


  • The U.S. Supreme Court has invited the Acting Solicitor General to express the views of the United States regarding Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., et.al, otherwise known as In re: Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation.
  • The request may signal the Supreme Court's intent to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's decision in this case, which held that international comity required dismissal of an otherwise valid antitrust claim, with prejudice, because the government of China appeared amicus curiae and asserted that its laws required defendants to engage in anti-competitive conduct.
  • The Second Circuit's ruling, if left to stand, could have far-reaching implications for U.S. companies working with foreign suppliers, manufacturers and distributors. For this reason, guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court would be welcome for all companies engaged in international commerce.

The U.S. Supreme Court on June 26, 2017, took the somewhat unusual step of inviting the Acting Solicitor General to express the views of the United States regarding Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., et.al, Case No. 16-1220, otherwise known as In re: Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation. This request may signal the Supreme Court's intent to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit's controversial decision in this case, No. 13-4791-cv (2d Cir. Sept. 20, 2016), which held that international comity required dismissal of an otherwise valid antitrust claim, with prejudice, because the government of China appeared amicus curiae and asserted that its laws required defendants to engage in anti-competitive conduct. The Second Circuit's ruling, if left to stand, may have far-reaching implications for U.S. companies working with foreign suppliers, manufacturers and distributors.


In 2005, the plaintiffs, U.S. vitamin C purchasers Animal Science Products Inc. and The Ranis Company Inc., brought a multi-district class action against Chinese vitamin C suppliers Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical and North China Pharmaceutical Group Corp., alleging that the Chinese suppliers conspired to fix the price and supply of vitamin C sold to U.S. companies on the international market in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act as well as Sections 5 and 16 of the Clayton Act. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York denied the defendants' motion to dismiss, and a jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs were awarded $147 million, and the defendants were enjoined from engaging in future anti-competitive conduct.

On appeal, the Second Circuit considered whether the principles of international comity require a federal court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction over the litigation. The Chinese government appeared amicus curiae before both the district and appellate courts (marking the first appearance by the Chinese government before a U.S. federal court). Specifically, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce submitted an amicus brief, stating that Chinese law required the defendants to fix the price and quantity of vitamin C sold abroad. Thus, the Ministry asserted, the Chinese suppliers were engaged in anticompetitive behavior dictated by Chinese law.

The Second Circuit held that the federal courts must defer to the Chinese government's interpretation of its own laws. Thus, the District Court abused its discretion by allowing the matter to proceed when U.S. and Chinese anti-competitive laws were in "true conflict," as principles of international comity required the District Court to abstain from exercising jurisdiction over the matter. Accordingly, the Second Circuit vacated the jury award, overturned the injunction and remanded the case with instructions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

The plaintiffs sought certiorari in January 2017. In late June, after all briefing on certiorari was otherwise completed, the Supreme Court "invited" the Acting Solicitor General "to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States."

International Comity and Deference

The central issue considered by the Second Circuit was whether the principles of international comity required the District Court to abstain from asserting jurisdiction over the plaintiffs' antitrust claims. As the Second Circuit stated, the doctrine of "international comity" is "not just a vague political concern favoring international cooperation when it is our interest to do so, but rather a principle under which judicial decisions reflect the systemic value of reciprocal tolerance and goodwill." As such, courts must balance the interests of the United States, the foreign state, and the just and efficient functioning rules of international law to ascertain whether it is appropriate to maintain jurisdiction over a matter that concerns matters of international comity.

In weighing these considerations, the Second Circuit applied a multi-factor balancing test established by Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, 549 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1976) and Mannington Mills, Inc. v. Congoleum Corp., 595 F.2d 1287 (3d Cir. 1979). These factors are:

  1. the degree of conflict with foreign law or policy
  2. the nationality of the parties, locations or principal places of business of corporations
  3. the relative importance of the alleged violation of conduct here as compared with conduct abroad
  4. the extent to which enforcement by either state can be expected to achieve compliance, the availability of a remedy aboard and the pendency of litigation there
  5. the existence of intent to harm or affect American commerce and its foreseeability
  6. the possible effect upon foreign relations if the court exercises jurisdiction and grants relief
  7. if relief is granted, whether a party will be placed in the position of being forced to perform an act illegal in either country or be under conflicting requirements by both countries
  8. whether the court can make its order effective
  9. whether an order for relief would be acceptable in this country if made by the foreign nation under similar circumstances
  10. whether a treaty with the affected nations has addressed the issue

In evaluating these factors, the Second Circuit focused on the degree to which the U.S. and Chinese laws on price-fixing were in "true conflict" making it impossible for an individual or entity to comply with both sets of laws. In making this determination, the Second Circuit evaluated the degree to which it was obligated to extend deference to the Chinese government's interpretation of its own laws and determined that a foreign government's statement interpreting its own laws must be afforded deference. The Second Circuit affirmed that "when a foreign government, acting through counsel or otherwise, directly participates in U.S. court proceedings by providing a sworn evidentiary proffers regarding the construction and effects of its laws and regulations, which is reasonable under the circumstances presented, a U.S. court is bound to defer to those statements," citing United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (1942) (which held that an official declaration from the Russian government explaining the intended effect of its 1918 decree nationalizing Russia's insurance business was conclusive and entitled to deference). The Second Circuit went on to state that, "[i]f deference by any measure is to mean anything, it must mean that a U.S. court not embark on a challenge to a foreign government's official representation to the court regarding its laws or regulations, even if that representation is inconsistent with how those laws might be interpreted under the principles of our legal system."

On this basis, the Second Circuit deferred to the Ministry's written interpretation of its laws and, as explained in the amicus brief, concluded that China's laws required the defendants to engage in anti-competitive behavior. Based on the deference afforded to the Ministry's written interpretation of China's laws, the Second Circuit held that the U.S. antitrust laws and Chinese law were in "true conflict" and the comity test weighed in favor of the courts abstaining from exercising jurisdiction over the matter.


For defendants faced with allegations of anti-competitive conduct occurring abroad, the Second Circuit's decision provides a clear road map to dismissal where the relevant foreign government is willing to appear and claim its laws conflict with the U.S. antitrust laws. For plaintiffs, the decision should give pause when considering claims against foreign companies, particularly those located in countries with laws that may provide the patina of legality to anti-competitive conduct.

For all companies engaged in international commerce, guidance from the U.S. Supreme Court would be welcome. If its request for input from the Acting Solicitor General is any indication, the Court may agree.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


From time to time Mondaq may send you emails promoting Mondaq services including new services. You may opt out of receiving such emails by clicking below.

*** If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of services offered by Mondaq you may opt out by clicking here .


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.