ARTICLE
4 November 2016

Efficient Infringement And The Undervaluation Of Standard-Essential Patents

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Faced with the growing problem of efficient infringement and the difficulty of obtaining adequate protection from the courts...
United States Intellectual Property

Faced with the growing problem of efficient infringement and the difficulty of obtaining adequate protection from the courts, US owners of standard-essential patents need to develop creative strategies to protect the value of their rights.

In a comprehensive article, published as a feature in Intellectual Asset Management magazine, several Mintz Levin attorneys discuss the extent of the growing problem, the courts' focus on "patent hold-up, not hold-out" (including analysis of Microsoft v. Motorola, CSIRO v. Cisco, Certain 3G Mobile Handsets, and Certain Wireless Devices with 3G and/or 4G Capabilities), the implications for moving forward, and some thoughts on strategy to overcome efficient infringement. IAM | Sept/Oct 2016: "Efficient infringement and the undervaluation of standard-essential patents"

A sidebar in the article points out that in dealing recently with the issue of patent hold-out, European courts appear to be demonstrating a better understanding of the issue and the threat it poses.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More