ARTICLE
29 December 2015

Appeals Court Rules On The Transmission Of 3D Files

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In a case with important implications for 3D printing, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in a dispute between tooth aligner competitors Align and ClearCorrect...
United States Intellectual Property

In a case with important implications for 3D printing, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—which decides appeals in all U.S. patent cases—ruled in a dispute between tooth aligner competitors Align and ClearCorrect that the U.S. International Trade Commission cannot stop digital blueprints of physical objects from being imported into the U.S. In this article, Finnegan attorneys  John F. Hornick and  Carlos J. Rosario discuss the case and how it relates to 3D printing.

Previously published in 3D Printing Industry

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More