ARTICLE
1 October 2015

AGs Reach $1 Million Settlement With Online Marketer Of Pimsleur Language Courses

MR
Michelman & Robinson LLP

Contributor

Michelman & Robinson LLP logo
Michelman & Robinson, LLP is a national law firm with offices in Los Angeles, Irvine, San Francisco, Chicago, and New York City. M&R represents a variety of clients in cross-border, complex, and class action litigation, along with employment, corporate transactional, regulatory, cybersecurity, privacy, real estate, white-collar, and bankruptcy matters.
The complaint alleged that the company and its owner, Dan Roitman, failed to clearly disclose the correct terms surrounding the purchase of a language course advertised as "only $9.95."
United States Consumer Protection

The Attorney General offices from the states of New York, Pennsylvania and Washington entered into a $1 million settlement with Internet Order LLC, doing business as Pimsleurapproach.com, over its use of 'negative option' marketing in the sale of Pimsleur-branded language audio courses over the Internet.

The complaint alleged that the company and its owner, Dan Roitman, failed to clearly disclose the correct terms surrounding the purchase of a language course advertised as "only $9.95." Internet Order LLC markets and sells online Pimsleur-branded foreign language-learning audio courses licensed by Simon and Schuster, primarily through its Internet website www.pimsleurapproach.com. The company advertises the audio courses for "only $9.95." The complaint alleged that upon signing up for this offer, the purchaser was enrolled in a "negative option plan," obligating the consumer to receive up to four additional audio courses at a cost of $256 per course. Thus, while the consumer thought the total obligation was "only $9.95," his or her obligation was as high as $1,024.

Under terms of the enforcement action, Internet Order must:

  • Clearly disclose the terms of any negative option sale, and must get consent from consumers before obligating them to the terms of the sale
  • Repeatedly notify consumers of the terms of a sale
  • Allow consumers to easily and effectively cancel an ongoing subscription in a negative option plan
  • Never charge any fee for the return of an item during a "free trial" period

The enforcement action requires Internet Order to pay back over $1 million in restitution to consumers nationwide.

This case serves as an important reminder that it is imperative to get proper consent from consumers before enrolling them in a negative option.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More