European Banking Authority Publishes Reports On Consistency Of Risk-Weighted Approaches And Calculation Of Counterparty Credit Risk Exposures And Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk

SS
Shearman & Sterling LLP

Contributor

Our success is built on our clients’ success. We have a long and distinguished history of supporting our clients wherever they do business, from major financial centers to emerging and growth markets. We represent many of the world’s leading corporations and major financial institutions, as well as emerging growth companies, governments and state-owned enterprises, often working on ground-breaking, precedent-setting matters. With a deep understanding of our clients' businesses and the industries they operate in, our work is driven by their need for outstanding legal and commercial advice.
On July 22, 2015, the EBA published two reports on the findings of two benchmarking exercises conducted under CRD.
European Union Finance and Banking

On July 22, 2015, the EBA published two reports on the findings of two benchmarking exercises conducted under CRD. The aim of the exercises is to assess and improve the consistency and comparability of risk weighted assets across large EU banks. The first report deals with findings on internal approaches applied for the calculation of RWAs for Low Default Portfolios across large EU firms. The study found that 75 percent of the observed differences in Global Charge levels across institutions can be explained by the proportion of defaulted exposures in a portfolio and portfolio mix. When each portfolio is looked at separately, the impact of defaulted exposures explains around 50 percent of GC differences for both large corporate and institutions portfolios. The remaining 50 percent could be attributed to bank-specific issues such as IRB parameters or risk management practices. Data was collected from 41 institutions for this study. The study was based only on draft technical standards, which will in the future be required to be used in benchmarking exercises. The report states that more in-depth analysis is required on the impact of collateral on internal loss-given-default estimates as well as comparisons between the internal ratings-based and standardized approaches. The second report deals with the internal approaches applied for Counterparty Credit Risk exposures under the Internal Model Method and Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk according to the Advanced Approach. This study was carried out using data collected by the Basel Committee for Banking Supervision and shows significant variability in the calculation of CCR and Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk when using the IMM across banks, especially where equity and foreign exchange OTC derivatives are concerned.

The press release and both reports are available at: http://www.eba.europa.eu/-/eba-publishes-rwa-assessment-as-the-next-step-in-improving-consistency-of-internal-model-outcom-1 .

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More