ARTICLE
30 October 2014

NJ Supreme Court To Decide Whether LAD Protects Divorcing Employee

PR
Proskauer Rose LLP

Contributor

The world’s leading organizations and global players choose Proskauer to represent them when they need it the most. Our top tier team of star trial attorneys, acclaimed transactional lawyers and exceptionally talented partners and associates have earned a reputation for the relentless pursuit of perfection and a dauntless pursuit of success.
Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to address whether the protection against marital status discrimination under the state’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) serves to prevent an employer from discharging an employee "because of the anticipated effect of [the] employee’s imminent divorce on the workplace."
United States Employment and HR

Last week, the New Jersey Supreme Court agreed to address whether the protection against marital status discrimination under the state's Law Against Discrimination (LAD) serves to prevent an employer from discharging an employee "because of the anticipated effect of [the] employee's imminent divorce on the workplace."  As detailed in our monthly newsletter, the Appellate Division recently answered this question in the affirmative and, in so doing, for the first time "interpret[ed] 'marital status' to encompass the state of being divorced."  The case—Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad—is sure to receive attention in the coming months.  Stay tuned...

NJ Supreme Court To Decide Whether LAD Protects Divorcing Employee

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More