Swatch Stops The Clock On "IWATCH"

SH
Stites & Harbison PLLC

Contributor

A full-service law firm representing clients across the United States and internationally, Stites & Harbison, PLLC is known as a preeminent firm managing sophisticated transactions, challenging litigation and complex regulatory matters on a daily basis.  The firm represents a broad spectrum of clients including multinational corporations, financial institutions, pharmaceutical companies, health care organizations, private companies, nonprofit organizations, and individuals. Stites & Harbison has 10 offices across five states.
Apple fans have been closely following details about the release of the Apple iWatch.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Apple fans have been closely following details about the release of the Apple iWatch. While Apple has not confirmed any details about the wearable technology, in August 2011, Apple filed a patent before the United States Patent & Trademark Office claiming a flexible display, a touchscreen, and a wireless communications antenna. The patent also contains the following drawing:

Further details of this rumoured smartwatch have not been released by Apple, but Apple has been busy filing trademark applications to protect the name. To date, Apple has filed applications to register the mark "IWATCH" in multiple countries, including Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Peru, Jamaica, India, Japan, Iceland, Switzerland and South Korea. Swatch, owner of the trademark "ISWATCH" is trying to stop the clock on these applications.

Swatch is the owner of a registration for "ISWATCH" in multiple countries for use in connection with watches, among other things. Swatch feels that registration of "IWATCH" by Apple for use in connection with watches would be too similar. As a result, Swatch has been opposing the registration of IWATCH and intends to continue to do so wherever Apple tries to register.  It remains to be seen how trademark offices around the world will lean on this issue. The Iceland Trademark Office has already refused registration of Apple's IWATCH trademark on the basis that it is "confusingly  similar" to Swatch's trademark.

Will Apple cease use of "IWATCH", enter into some sort of agreement with Swatch permitting it to use the mark, or will trademark offices decide that with all the "i" trademarks out there, the marks are not confusingly similar? Only time will tell.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More