ARTICLE
15 April 2014

Colorado Supreme Court Grants To Consider Use Of Lone Pine Orders In Toxic Tort Case Involving Hydraulic Fracturing

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Monday, the Colorado Supreme Court granted a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Antero Resources, et al. v. Strudley, et al.
United States Energy and Natural Resources

On Monday, the Colorado Supreme Court granted a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Antero Resources, et al. v. Strudley, et al. The Strudley case involves claims relating to alleged injuries from natural gas drilling operations near the Strudley's home in Silt, Colorado. The Strudley's case was dismissed by the district court after it entered a Lone Pine Order requiring the Strudleys to present prima facie evidence in support of their claims. When they failed to do so, the district court dismissed the case with prejudice. The Colorado Court of Appeals reversed, finding that Lone Pine Order were prohibited as a matter of law in Colorado.

The Colorado Supreme Court will now consider two issues. First, whether a district court in Colorado is barred as a matter of law from entering a modified case management order requiring a plaintiff to produce evidence essential to his or her claims after initial disclosures but before further discovery is allowed. Second, assuming such a modified case management order is allowed, whether the district court acted within its discretion in entering and enforcing such an order.

The Strudley case has garnered significant attention. A number of interested parties, including the Colorado Petroleum Association, filed amicus briefs asking the Court to hear the case. In addition to the arguments raised by the named parties, a number of friends of the court briefs are likely to be filed for and against the issue as the case moves forward. We will continue to monitor this case at the North America Shale Blog.

Prior coverage of this case can be found here and here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More